SMCO vs. TINY ETF Comparison

Comparison of Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO) to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY)

SMCO

Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF

SMCO Description

The Sub-Adviser uses its proprietary Small & Mid Cap Opportunities investment process ("SMCO Process") to seek risk-adjusted returns by investing in U.S. equity securities within the small- and mid-cap asset classes. The fund"s portfolio will typically consist of between 50-75 stocks. The fund"s portfolio will consistently consist of stocks that the Sub-Adviser deems fundamentally attractive and reasonably valued. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund"s net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes, will be invested in equity securities of small- and mid-capitalization companies.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.64

Average Daily Volume

15,370

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

TINY

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF

TINY Description

TINY is a passively managed fund that invests in securities from developed countries perceived to help businesses use nanotechnology to transform lives and revolutionize different industries. Companies considered should be involved in the production, application, development, or promotion of nanotechnologies. Using natural language processing algorithm, filings and public information are scanned to identify companies that have or are expected to have significant exposure to nanotechnology. Companies are then scored and ranked based on their level of exposure. Only the 30 highest-ranking companies are selected. Securities are weighted by market cap with a maximum limit of 4.5%. The index is reconstituted and rebalanced semi-annually in May and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$49.14

Average Daily Volume

2,036

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	SMCO	TINY
30 Days	1.06%	0.25%
60 Days	4.04%	12.51%
90 Days	4.47%	-7.95%
12 Months		42.84%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in SMCO	Weight in TINY	Overlap

SMCO Overweight 10 Positions Relative to TINY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CLH	C	3.0%
KD	F	2.64%
HLI	C	2.43%
PRIM	C	2.4%
DY	C	2.39%
EME	C	2.07%
LYV	A	2.07%
CBU	D	2.06%
COLD	D	2.02%
NVT	D	1.96%

SMCO Underweight 20 Positions Relative to TINY

Symbol	Grade	Weight
COHR	B	-7.34%
NVDA	C	-6.07%
TSM	C	-5.77%
KLAC	B	-4.94%
ONTO	B	-4.84%
A	B	-4.65%
ACLS	F	-4.56%
AMAT	B	-4.37%
LRCX	D	-3.88%
ENTG	D	-3.85%
BRKR	D	-3.8%
INTC	D	-3.24%
VECO	F	-2.75%
NVAX	C	-2.75%
UCTT	D	-2.36%
PLAB	D	-2.29%
ACMR	D	-1.47%
LASR	F	-0.76%
SKYT	D	-0.64%
LWLG	F	-0.52%