SIXG vs. QTUM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (SIXG) to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM)

SIXG

Defiance Connective Technologies ETF

SIXG Description

The fund uses a passive management approach to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the index. The index is a rules-based index that consists of a tiered, modified market capitalization-weighted portfolio of the U.S.-listed equity securities, including depositary receipts, of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of 5G networking and communication technologies (collectively, "5G Companies").

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$45.83

Average Daily Volume

18,631

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QTUM

Defiance Quantum ETF

QTUM Description

The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the BlueStar Quantum Computing and Machine Learning Index (the "index"). Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index or in depositary receipts representing such component securities. The index consists of a modified equal-weighted portfolio of the stock of companies whose products or services are predominantly tied to the development of quantum computing and machine learning technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$66.73

Average Daily Volume

34,717

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	SIXG	QTUM
30 Days	-0.42%	3.19%
60 Days	4.71%	7.92%
90 Days	7.95%	7.90%
12 Months		32.98%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in SIXG	Weight in QTUM	Overlap
JNPR	D	1.46%	1.49%	1.46%
MRVL	B	2.39%	1.71%	1.71%
NOK	D	1.82%	1.63%	1.63%
NVDA	A	5.65%	1.58%	1.58%
QCOM	F	3.32%	1.06%	1.06%

SIXG Overweight 44 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ORCL	A	5.22%
AVGO	D	4.84%
AAPL	C	4.7%
CSCO	B	4.16%
ANET	D	2.67%
CRDO	C	2.2%
GSAT	C	2.15%
DDOG	A	2.09%
IDCC	B	2.02%
CIEN	B	1.9%
ERIC	B	1.86%
KD	A	1.83%
ATEN	A	1.82%
FFIV	A	1.8%
MTSI	B	1.8%
CSGS	B	1.74%
VIAV	C	1.72%
KEYS	A	1.71%
NTAP	C	1.68%
TMUS	B	1.66%
EXTR	C	1.64%
NTCT	C	1.63%
DT	D	1.62%
SWI	B	1.55%
IRDM	F	1.53%
DOX	D	1.52%
ARM	F	1.51%
HCP	B	1.5%
INFN	D	1.49%
T	A	1.48%
MXL	C	1.46%
AKAM	F	1.44%
EQIX	A	1.44%
DOCN	D	1.35%
VZ	C	1.33%
SWKS	F	1.32%
NPAB	F	1.29%
NABL	F	1.24%
CCI	C	1.21%
CALX	F	1.21%
COMM	D	1.17%
AMT	D	1.15%
QRVO	F	0.94%
VSAT	F	0.72%

SIXG Underweight 45 Positions Relative to QTUM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MSTR	B	-3.19%
QBTS	B	-2.38%
RGTI	C	-2.25%
COHR	B	-2.02%
RDNT	B	-1.9%
IBM	C	-1.72%
WIT	A	-1.71%
NOC	D	-1.7%
ACN	B	-1.7%
LMT	D	-1.69%
BABA	D	-1.66%
BAH	F	-1.64%
RTX	D	-1.59%
TSM	C	-1.53%
TXN	C	-1.48%
HON	B	-1.47%
HPE	B	-1.43%
GOOGL	B	-1.38%
ABBV	F	-1.35%
CDNS	B	-1.31%
MSFT	D	-1.29%
SNPS	C	-1.28%
BIDU	D	-1.27%
ADI	D	-1.26%
NVEC	D	-1.26%
ON	F	-1.25%
AMD	F	-1.25%
TDC	D	-1.2%
CRUS	F	-1.15%
MKSI	C	-1.14%
LSCC	F	-1.13%
SYNA	D	-1.12%
INTC	C	-1.11%
NXPI	F	-1.09%
KLAC	F	-1.09%
AMAT	F	-1.08%
ESTC	C	-1.07%
ONTO	F	-1.06%
MU	D	-1.05%
MCHP	F	-1.01%
FORM	F	-1.0%
LRCX	F	-1.0%
TER	F	-0.99%
ASML	F	-0.85%
STM	F	-0.81%