SIMS vs. CNRG ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS) to SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG)
SIMS

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF

SIMS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Intelligent Infrastructure sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.91

Average Daily Volume

1,191

Number of Holdings *

41

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CNRG

SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

CNRG Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is designed to capture companies whose products and services are driving innovation behind clean power. The fund may invest in equity securities that are not included in the index, cash and cash equivalents or money market instruments, such as repurchase agreements and money market funds. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$63.49

Average Daily Volume

12,989

Number of Holdings *

41

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period SIMS CNRG
30 Days 5.33% 6.28%
60 Days 7.98% -1.27%
90 Days 6.18% 1.55%
12 Months 17.43% 0.89%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in SIMS Weight in CNRG Overlap
ADTN A 2.66% 2.2% 2.2%
AY B 1.63% 3.06% 1.63%
BE B 2.29% 4.95% 2.29%
GNRC B 3.47% 3.85% 3.47%
SHLS F 1.96% 1.9% 1.9%
SIMS Overweight 36 Positions Relative to CNRG
Symbol Grade Weight
MWA B 3.62%
PNR A 3.52%
WTTR B 3.34%
REZI A 3.31%
JCI C 3.18%
CARR D 3.09%
BMI B 3.08%
ITRI B 2.88%
VLTO D 2.71%
TTEK F 2.55%
ALRM C 2.51%
XYL D 2.3%
SLAB D 2.28%
ARLO C 2.23%
ROKU D 2.14%
PSN D 2.12%
AYI B 2.08%
ERII D 1.94%
GTLS B 1.88%
NRG B 1.85%
AME A 1.81%
HON B 1.8%
CHPT F 1.64%
ROP B 1.64%
NVEE F 1.57%
BIDU F 1.45%
ON D 1.43%
GNTX C 1.42%
CNM D 1.34%
BP D 1.33%
BLNK F 1.25%
CWCO C 1.03%
MVIS F 0.99%
STM F 0.94%
STEM F 0.65%
REKR F 0.47%
SIMS Underweight 36 Positions Relative to CNRG
Symbol Grade Weight
GEV B -5.88%
TSLA B -4.2%
ACA A -3.79%
CEG D -3.28%
NEE D -3.24%
ORA B -3.2%
AGR B -3.12%
ALE A -3.1%
DQ F -3.0%
CMI A -2.87%
VMI B -2.74%
GLW B -2.71%
JKS F -2.68%
AMSC B -2.64%
NOVA F -2.37%
AMRC F -2.29%
TAC B -2.25%
EBR F -2.18%
RUN F -2.12%
ROCK C -2.11%
FLNC C -2.11%
AES F -2.06%
PLUG F -2.01%
CSIQ F -1.96%
FSLR F -1.87%
AMAT F -1.56%
ARRY C -1.48%
ENPH F -1.44%
RNW D -1.43%
AMPS C -1.42%
HY D -1.3%
SEDG F -0.74%
GNE D -0.67%
TPIC F -0.4%
MNTK F -0.36%
ENIC D -0.33%
Compare ETFs