SEMI vs. HACK ETF Comparison
Comparison of Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF (SEMI) to ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK)
SEMI
Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF
SEMI Description
SEMI is designed to provide exposure to the broad information technology sector by focusing on pure-play companies related to the semiconductor industry. The fund actively and generally invests in 30-50 high-conviction semiconductor or semiconductor-related firms, as defined by GICS, including those under communication equipment, electronic equipment, technology hardware, storage and peripherals, and software. Additionally, the fund requires at least 25% of its assets be invested in companies in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industry. Security selection is done through extensive in-depth research. SEMI is a non-transparent ETF and does not provide daily disclosure of its portfolio holdings unlike other ETFs. As such, there is a risk that shares of the fund may trade at wider spreads, especially during periods of volatility. The fund instead publishes a trading basket daily, which provides a preview of selected holdings without disclosing the actual portfolio.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.88
Average Daily Volume
3,033
28
HACK
ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF
HACK Description
The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Prime Cyber Defense Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the component securities of the index and in ADRs and GDRs based on the component securities in the index. The index tracks the performance of the exchange-listed equity securities of companies across the globe that (i) engage in providing cybersecurity applications or services as a vital component of its overall business or (ii) provide hardware or software for cybersecurity activities as a vital component of its overall business.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$73.91
Average Daily Volume
62,608
23
Performance
| Period | SEMI | HACK |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 1.28% | 7.85% |
| 60 Days | 15.37% | 16.04% |
| 90 Days | 9.59% | 17.29% |
| 12 Months | 41.28% | 38.88% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in SEMI | Weight in HACK | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | B | 15.11% | 10.21% | 10.21% |
SEMI Overweight 27 Positions Relative to HACK
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | A | 17.8% | |
| LRCX | F | 6.56% | |
| ADI | C | 4.55% | |
| ASML | F | 4.49% | |
| AMAT | F | 4.42% | |
| TSM | C | 4.34% | |
| KLAC | F | 4.33% | |
| MPWR | D | 3.9% | |
| NXPI | D | 3.68% | |
| QCOM | C | 3.27% | |
| MCHP | F | 2.95% | |
| AMD | F | 2.83% | |
| MRVL | B | 2.79% | |
| MU | C | 2.59% | |
| TER | F | 2.3% | |
| ON | C | 2.18% | |
| SNPS | B | 1.79% | |
| ARM | C | 1.7% | |
| CDNS | B | 1.4% | |
| TXN | A | 1.0% | |
| QRVO | F | 0.45% | |
| GFS | D | 0.43% | |
| WDC | B | 0.32% | |
| INTC | C | 0.28% | |
| SLAB | D | 0.27% | |
| SWKS | F | 0.23% | |
| MKSI | F | 0.23% |
SEMI Underweight 22 Positions Relative to HACK
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO | A | -7.52% | |
| PANW | A | -6.02% | |
| CRWD | B | -5.59% | |
| GD | B | -5.33% | |
| NOC | D | -5.21% | |
| FTNT | B | -5.05% | |
| LDOS | B | -4.57% | |
| BAH | C | -4.39% | |
| NET | B | -4.18% | |
| GEN | B | -3.89% | |
| FFIV | B | -3.81% | |
| ZS | C | -3.53% | |
| CHKP | D | -3.4% | |
| CYBR | B | -3.35% | |
| S | B | -3.3% | |
| OKTA | D | -3.08% | |
| VRNS | D | -2.58% | |
| RBRK | B | -2.56% | |
| TENB | D | -2.54% | |
| QLYS | B | -2.52% | |
| RPD | C | -2.37% | |
| FSLY | C | -2.07% |
SEMI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
HACK: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
