RVER vs. XLV ETF Comparison
Comparison of Advisor Managed Portfolios Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) to SPDR Select Sector Fund - Health Care (XLV)
RVER
Advisor Managed Portfolios Trenchless Fund ETF
RVER Description
RVER seeks to outperform the S&P 500 Index over all time horizons through a narrow exposure to the US equity market. The fund typically invests in approximately 12 to 30 US-listed stocks of any market capitalization. The portfolio construction starts by screening companies based on valuation metrics such as free cash flow, net income, EBITDA, and revenue. Securities are then assessed using growth factors, including top and bottom-line revenue and net income growth. This analysis seeks to exclude firms with negative outliers and those the sub-adviser believes are likely to miss earnings expectations. The remaining companies are screened based on a review of the number and size of institutional holders. After these three initial screens, the sub-adviser ranks and selects from the remaining companies based on its view of positive price change potential. As an actively managed fund, the sub-adviser has full discretion to make buy, sell, and hold decisions at any time.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.19
Average Daily Volume
7,843
16
XLV
SPDR Select Sector Fund - Health Care
XLV Description
The investment seeks investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of publicly traded equity securities of companies in The Health Care Select Sector Index. In seeking to track the performance of the index, the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies from the following industries: pharmaceuticals; health care equipment & supplies; health care providers & services; biotechnology; life sciences tools & services; and health care technology. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$146.17
Average Daily Volume
6,919,577
61
Performance
Period | RVER | XLV |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 11.36% | -1.63% |
60 Days | 12.82% | -4.48% |
90 Days | 21.66% | -5.82% |
12 Months | 13.95% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in RVER | Weight in XLV | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRK | D | 4.34% | 4.71% | 4.34% |
RVER Underweight 60 Positions Relative to XLV
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
LLY | D | -11.35% | |
UNH | B | -10.59% | |
JNJ | D | -7.04% | |
ABBV | D | -5.66% | |
ABT | B | -3.85% | |
TMO | F | -3.74% | |
ISRG | B | -3.67% | |
AMGN | F | -2.95% | |
DHR | D | -2.86% | |
PFE | D | -2.7% | |
BSX | B | -2.53% | |
SYK | B | -2.52% | |
BMY | B | -2.24% | |
VRTX | D | -2.22% | |
GILD | B | -2.11% | |
MDT | D | -2.06% | |
ELV | F | -1.76% | |
CI | D | -1.73% | |
MCK | B | -1.54% | |
ZTS | F | -1.52% | |
REGN | F | -1.51% | |
CVS | D | -1.36% | |
BDX | F | -1.23% | |
HCA | F | -1.18% | |
COR | A | -0.81% | |
EW | C | -0.8% | |
GEHC | F | -0.74% | |
A | D | -0.72% | |
HUM | C | -0.68% | |
RMD | C | -0.68% | |
IDXX | F | -0.66% | |
IQV | D | -0.64% | |
CNC | F | -0.59% | |
DXCM | C | -0.58% | |
CAH | B | -0.56% | |
MTD | D | -0.47% | |
WST | C | -0.43% | |
BIIB | F | -0.43% | |
ZBH | C | -0.42% | |
WAT | A | -0.41% | |
STE | F | -0.4% | |
LH | B | -0.38% | |
PODD | B | -0.36% | |
HOLX | D | -0.35% | |
DGX | B | -0.34% | |
MOH | D | -0.33% | |
BAX | F | -0.32% | |
VTRS | B | -0.3% | |
ALGN | D | -0.3% | |
RVTY | D | -0.26% | |
MRNA | F | -0.24% | |
INCY | B | -0.22% | |
UHS | D | -0.22% | |
TECH | C | -0.21% | |
CTLT | B | -0.2% | |
CRL | D | -0.19% | |
HSIC | B | -0.18% | |
SOLV | C | -0.18% | |
TFX | F | -0.17% | |
DVA | A | -0.14% |
RVER: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
XLV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords