RVER vs. IHF ETF Comparison
Comparison of Advisor Managed Portfolios Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) to iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF)
RVER
Advisor Managed Portfolios Trenchless Fund ETF
RVER Description
RVER seeks to outperform the S&P 500 Index over all time horizons through a narrow exposure to the US equity market. The fund typically invests in approximately 12 to 30 US-listed stocks of any market capitalization. The portfolio construction starts by screening companies based on valuation metrics such as free cash flow, net income, EBITDA, and revenue. Securities are then assessed using growth factors, including top and bottom-line revenue and net income growth. This analysis seeks to exclude firms with negative outliers and those the sub-adviser believes are likely to miss earnings expectations. The remaining companies are screened based on a review of the number and size of institutional holders. After these three initial screens, the sub-adviser ranks and selects from the remaining companies based on its view of positive price change potential. As an actively managed fund, the sub-adviser has full discretion to make buy, sell, and hold decisions at any time.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$29.30
Average Daily Volume
7,443
16
IHF
iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF
IHF Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$53.42
Average Daily Volume
61,864
66
Performance
| Period | RVER | IHF |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 7.79% | 0.32% |
| 60 Days | 12.17% | -6.54% |
| 90 Days | 16.22% | -7.21% |
| 12 Months | 4.98% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in RVER | Weight in IHF | Overlap |
|---|
RVER Underweight 66 Positions Relative to IHF
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | B | -24.61% | |
| ELV | F | -11.41% | |
| CI | D | -8.11% | |
| VEEV | C | -4.67% | |
| CVS | D | -4.65% | |
| HCA | F | -4.32% | |
| HUM | C | -4.12% | |
| CNC | D | -3.83% | |
| LH | B | -3.38% | |
| DGX | A | -3.06% | |
| MOH | F | -2.95% | |
| THC | D | -2.55% | |
| UHS | D | -2.05% | |
| EHC | B | -1.7% | |
| HQY | A | -1.47% | |
| CHE | D | -1.44% | |
| ENSG | C | -1.39% | |
| DVA | C | -1.27% | |
| DOCS | C | -1.06% | |
| RDNT | B | -0.89% | |
| SEM | B | -0.67% | |
| OPCH | D | -0.64% | |
| HIMS | B | -0.63% | |
| GH | B | -0.61% | |
| ACHC | F | -0.6% | |
| CRVL | B | -0.54% | |
| AMED | F | -0.5% | |
| PINC | B | -0.4% | |
| RCM | A | -0.38% | |
| ADUS | D | -0.37% | |
| PRVA | C | -0.37% | |
| NEO | C | -0.33% | |
| ASTH | F | -0.29% | |
| SGRY | F | -0.29% | |
| NHC | C | -0.27% | |
| TDOC | C | -0.27% | |
| EVH | F | -0.23% | |
| USPH | B | -0.23% | |
| CLOV | D | -0.21% | |
| ALHC | C | -0.2% | |
| MD | C | -0.2% | |
| PGNY | F | -0.19% | |
| CERT | F | -0.19% | |
| SDGR | C | -0.18% | |
| BKD | F | -0.18% | |
| BTSG | C | -0.18% | |
| PHR | F | -0.17% | |
| LFST | B | -0.16% | |
| PNTG | D | -0.16% | |
| AMN | F | -0.15% | |
| HSTM | B | -0.13% | |
| CSTL | D | -0.13% | |
| PACS | F | -0.11% | |
| OPK | C | -0.1% | |
| CYH | F | -0.08% | |
| HCAT | D | -0.08% | |
| SLP | D | -0.08% | |
| AGL | F | -0.08% | |
| FLGT | F | -0.06% | |
| GDRX | F | -0.06% | |
| DCGO | B | -0.06% | |
| NRC | F | -0.05% | |
| CCRN | F | -0.05% | |
| DH | F | -0.04% | |
| ACCD | D | -0.04% | |
| MODV | C | -0.03% |
RVER: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
IHF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
