RVER vs. FOVL ETF Comparison
Comparison of Advisor Managed Portfolios Trenchless Fund ETF (RVER) to iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL)
RVER
Advisor Managed Portfolios Trenchless Fund ETF
RVER Description
RVER seeks to outperform the S&P 500 Index over all time horizons through a narrow exposure to the US equity market. The fund typically invests in approximately 12 to 30 US-listed stocks of any market capitalization. The portfolio construction starts by screening companies based on valuation metrics such as free cash flow, net income, EBITDA, and revenue. Securities are then assessed using growth factors, including top and bottom-line revenue and net income growth. This analysis seeks to exclude firms with negative outliers and those the sub-adviser believes are likely to miss earnings expectations. The remaining companies are screened based on a review of the number and size of institutional holders. After these three initial screens, the sub-adviser ranks and selects from the remaining companies based on its view of positive price change potential. As an actively managed fund, the sub-adviser has full discretion to make buy, sell, and hold decisions at any time.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.79
Average Daily Volume
3,933
9
FOVL
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
FOVL Description
The investment seeks to track the to track the investment results of the Focused Value Select Index, which is an objective, rules-based, equal-weighted equity index provided by FTSE Russell. The underlying index measures the performance of large- and mid-capitalization U.S. companies with prominent value factor characteristics, as determined by Russell. The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its assets in the component securities of the underlying index and may invest up to 10% of its assets in certain futures, options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents. It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$67.65
Average Daily Volume
1,886
39
Performance
| Period | RVER | FOVL |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 3.14% | 2.47% |
| 60 Days | 11.84% | 9.26% |
| 90 Days | 2.11% | 13.12% |
| 12 Months | 42.44% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in RVER | Weight in FOVL | Overlap |
|---|
RVER Underweight 39 Positions Relative to FOVL
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FYBR | C | -3.93% | |
| TOL | A | -3.89% | |
| PNFP | D | -3.48% | |
| IBKR | A | -3.37% | |
| SF | A | -3.2% | |
| AXS | A | -3.05% | |
| JPM | D | -2.98% | |
| SNV | D | -2.96% | |
| ORI | B | -2.91% | |
| LPX | A | -2.91% | |
| BLDR | B | -2.86% | |
| JHG | C | -2.86% | |
| T | A | -2.81% | |
| COF | C | -2.78% | |
| FHB | D | -2.66% | |
| Z | C | -2.66% | |
| CNA | D | -2.62% | |
| CUZ | C | -2.62% | |
| KMI | A | -2.61% | |
| WLK | C | -2.57% | |
| WTM | D | -2.54% | |
| FNB | D | -2.51% | |
| WBS | D | -2.5% | |
| HPE | B | -2.48% | |
| STT | C | -2.46% | |
| DFS | C | -2.44% | |
| AMG | B | -2.39% | |
| PFG | C | -2.32% | |
| PNW | A | -2.23% | |
| AN | C | -2.21% | |
| LYB | D | -2.17% | |
| THO | B | -2.16% | |
| SNDR | C | -2.01% | |
| AGR | C | -1.95% | |
| NUE | D | -1.88% | |
| UNM | A | -1.75% | |
| ALK | B | -1.71% | |
| CLF | D | -1.55% | |
| LLYVK | A | -0.79% |
RVER: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
FOVL: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
