RPV vs. XLC ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) to The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC)
RPV

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$87.80

Average Daily Volume

146,967

Number of Holdings *

92

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XLC

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLC Description The investment seeks to correspond generally to the price and yield performance of publicly traded equity securities of companies in the Communication Services Select Sector Index. Normally, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies that have been identified as Communication Services companies by the GICSĀ®, including securities of companies from the following industries: diversified telecommunication services; wireless telecommunication services; media; entertainment; and interactive media & services. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$90.19

Average Daily Volume

4,562,597

Number of Holdings *

22

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period RPV XLC
30 Days -1.33% 3.60%
60 Days 4.69% 6.75%
90 Days 6.07% 5.08%
12 Months 25.66% 39.90%
8 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in RPV Weight in XLC Overlap
FOX A 0.28% 0.88% 0.28%
FOXA A 0.58% 1.63% 0.58%
NWS D 0.13% 0.54% 0.13%
NWSA D 0.4% 1.72% 0.4%
PARA F 1.85% 1.09% 1.09%
T A 0.92% 4.36% 0.92%
VZ A 0.63% 4.38% 0.63%
WBD D 1.3% 3.18% 1.3%
RPV Overweight 84 Positions Relative to XLC
Symbol Grade Weight
GM D 4.16%
BRK.A C 3.83%
MHK B 2.77%
UAL B 2.69%
F D 2.32%
VTRS D 2.21%
TSN D 2.19%
C B 2.08%
CFG D 1.96%
IVZ A 1.91%
KR C 1.91%
VLO F 1.79%
BG F 1.76%
CNC F 1.74%
CVS D 1.7%
KMX F 1.57%
SW C 1.54%
PSX D 1.48%
NRG A 1.46%
CI D 1.43%
HPE B 1.42%
BBY B 1.39%
BWA B 1.36%
UHS D 1.35%
IP C 1.34%
TFC D 1.32%
COF C 1.29%
MCK F 1.27%
SYF B 1.2%
CAH B 1.18%
MTB C 1.14%
PRU C 1.06%
LUV B 1.03%
L D 1.03%
BK C 1.02%
ADM D 1.01%
BAC D 0.99%
AIG F 0.94%
WFC D 0.93%
KHC D 0.93%
RF C 0.88%
HBAN D 0.88%
STT C 0.88%
WBA F 0.87%
KEY C 0.86%
MOS D 0.84%
IFF C 0.8%
TAP D 0.79%
HIG A 0.78%
GS C 0.77%
MET A 0.72%
SWK A 0.7%
FITB C 0.66%
AIZ A 0.65%
PNC C 0.64%
BEN F 0.61%
EMN C 0.6%
CAG D 0.6%
EVRG C 0.6%
CINF A 0.59%
DOW B 0.59%
ALL B 0.58%
PNW A 0.57%
TGT C 0.56%
EG B 0.56%
CHRW A 0.56%
CTVA A 0.55%
KMI A 0.55%
ELV F 0.55%
TRV C 0.54%
EQT B 0.54%
ES C 0.54%
USB C 0.53%
HPQ C 0.52%
PFG C 0.52%
SYY B 0.52%
HSIC D 0.5%
FDX D 0.5%
LYB D 0.5%
ARE D 0.5%
CVX B 0.43%
LKQ F 0.41%
ALB D 0.38%
HUM F 0.31%
RPV Underweight 14 Positions Relative to XLC
Symbol Grade Weight
META A -20.35%
GOOGL B -10.65%
GOOG B -8.79%
NFLX A -6.11%
DIS D -4.58%
CMCSA B -4.52%
TMUS A -4.37%
EA D -4.29%
TTWO F -4.25%
CHTR D -4.06%
OMC C -3.46%
LYV A -2.91%
IPG C -2.03%
MTCH B -1.65%
Compare ETFs