RPV vs. JHCB ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) to John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF (JHCB)

RPV

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$87.80

Average Daily Volume

119,188

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

JHCB

John Hancock Corporate Bond ETF

JHCB Description

John Hancock Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - John Hancock Multifactor Media and Communications ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by John Hancock Investment Management LLC. It is co-managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors L.P. The fund invests in public equity markets of the United States. It invests in stocks of companies operating across media and entertainment, communication services sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. The fund seeks to track the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Media and Communications Index, by using full replication technique. John Hancock Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - John Hancock Multifactor Media and Communications ETF was formed on March 12, 2019 and is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$22.16

Average Daily Volume

17,712

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RPV	JHCB
30 Days	2.05%	2.26%
60 Days	0.18%	4.36%
90 Days	5.72%	5.15%
12 Months	17.59%	12.21%

8 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RPV	Weight in JHCB	Overlap
BAC	D	1.0%	2.46%	1.0%
C	D	1.97%	2.07%	1.97%
CFG	C	1.95%	2.11%	1.95%
KMI	B	0.54%	0.99%	0.54%
NRG	C	1.3%	1.48%	1.3%
PRU	C	1.03%	1.03%	1.03%
VTRS	C	2.3%	1.05%	1.05%
VZ	A	0.64%	1.53%	0.64%

RPV Overweight 86 Positions Relative to JHCB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GM	C	4.21%
BRK.A	C	3.85%
MHK	B	2.67%
UAL	C	2.35%
F	D	2.33%
TSN	C	2.31%
KR	B	1.91%
VLO	F	1.81%
PARA	F	1.79%
CNC	C	1.78%
BG	F	1.77%
IVZ	C	1.76%
CVS	D	1.63%
KMX	D	1.58%
CI	B	1.52%
PSX	F	1.44%
SW	B	1.4%
UHS	B	1.38%
MCK	F	1.36%
BBY	B	1.35%
IP	B	1.33%
TFC	D	1.32%
CAH	B	1.24%
BWA	F	1.21%
HPE	F	1.21%
WBD	D	1.21%
COF	D	1.21%
SYF	D	1.14%
MTB	B	1.1%
L	C	1.04%
ADM	D	1.03%
LUV	C	1.02%
AAL	D	1.02%
BK	A	1.0%
KHC	C	0.95%
AIG	D	0.95%
T	A	0.93%
WFC	F	0.88%
WBA	F	0.87%
HBAN	B	0.87%
KEY	B	0.85%
RF	C	0.85%
STT	B	0.84%
IFF	B	0.8%
HIG	B	0.79%
MOS	F	0.79%
TAP	C	0.77%
GS	D	0.75%
MET	B	0.68%
SWK	B	0.64%
AIZ	C	0.64%
FITB	B	0.64%
PNC	B	0.63%
CINF	B	0.6%
CAG	B	0.6%
EVRG	A	0.6%
PNW	A	0.59%
ELV	B	0.59%
ALL	A	0.59%
BEN	D	0.59%
ES	B	0.55%
EG	B	0.55%
DOW	F	0.55%
TGT	C	0.55%
TRV	A	0.54%
FOXA	C	0.54%
FDX	C	0.54%
EMN	A	0.54%
CTVA	B	0.53%
SYY	C	0.53%
CHRW	C	0.53%
USB	C	0.52%
ARE	B	0.51%
LYB	F	0.5%
BIO	C	0.5%
HPQ	D	0.49%
EQT	D	0.49%
PFG	C	0.49%
HSIC	D	0.47%
CVX	D	0.42%
LKQ	D	0.41%
NWSA	D	0.4%
ALB	D	0.35%
HUM	F	0.32%
FOX	C	0.27%
NWS	D	0.13%

RPV Underweight 31 Positions Relative to JHCB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CAF	F	-2.45%
CMCSA	D	-2.21%
BCS	B	-2.2%
LYG	B	-2.19%
MSFT	C	-2.04%
AMZN	C	-2.02%
GJS	B	-1.97%
AAPL	D	-1.95%
GE	A	-1.72%
NVDA	D	-1.58%
ORCL	B	-1.57%
ENB	A	-1.55%
MPLX	B	-1.47%
CVE	F	-1.21%
BKNG	B	-1.17%
ET	B	-1.16%
DLTR	F	-1.11%
MU	F	-1.11%
HCA	A	-1.1%
AMT	B	-1.09%
VMC	D	-1.08%
BA	F	-1.06%
ABBV	B	-1.06%
ARCC	C	-1.05%
AL	D	-1.03%
V	A	-1.01%
AVGO	C	-1.0%
WMB	A	-1.0%
RPRX	C	-0.98%
EQIX	B	-0.96%
MSI	B	-0.61%