RPV vs. ITB ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) to iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB)

RPV

Guggenheim S&P 500 Pure Value ETF

RPV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P 500 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P 500 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$88.73

Average Daily Volume

140,890

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ITB

iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF

ITB Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the home construction sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the home construction sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$117.15

Average Daily Volume

1,628,664

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RPV	ITB
30 Days	1.06%	-7.30%
60 Days	-0.29%	-3.07%
90 Days	5.80%	1.19%
12 Months	26.95%	49.47%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RPV	Weight in ITB	Overlap
	MHK	D	2.63%	1.11%	1.11%

RPV Overweight 92 Positions Relative to ITB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GM	B	4.69%
BRK.A	D	3.81%
UAL	A	3.43%
F	D	2.4%
VTRS	B	2.19%
TSN	D	2.15%
C	A	2.1%
CFG	A	1.99%
KR	A	1.91%
IVZ	A	1.9%
PARA	C	1.75%
VLO	F	1.72%
BG	F	1.61%
CVS	F	1.55%
KMX	F	1.47%
PSX	F	1.44%
CNC	D	1.43%
NRG	B	1.42%
SW	A	1.4%
COR	A	1.37%
HPE	A	1.36%
TFC	C	1.34%
SYF	B	1.33%
COF	A	1.32%
IP	A	1.32%
UHS	D	1.31%
CI	D	1.3%
MCK	C	1.3%
BBY	D	1.27%
MTB	B	1.25%
BWA	D	1.23%
CAH	B	1.2%
WBD	C	1.16%
PRU	B	1.09%
BK	B	1.08%
WFC	B	1.08%
BAC	B	1.07%
L	C	1.05%
LUV	A	1.0%
AIG	B	0.99%
ADM	F	0.95%
HBAN	B	0.93%
T	A	0.93%
KHC	D	0.92%
STT	A	0.91%
RF	B	0.9%
WBA	C	0.89%
KEY	B	0.88%
MOS	B	0.82%
HIG	D	0.8%
GS	B	0.8%
IFF	D	0.77%
TAP	D	0.77%
MET	C	0.73%
FITB	B	0.67%
SWK	D	0.65%
PNC	B	0.65%
AIZ	D	0.63%
KMI	B	0.62%
EVRG	C	0.6%
VZ	D	0.59%
ALL	C	0.59%
BEN	B	0.59%
CINF	B	0.59%
TRV	B	0.58%
EMN	C	0.57%
FOXA	A	0.57%
PNW	D	0.57%
USB	B	0.56%
CTVA	A	0.56%
EG	F	0.55%
CHRW	C	0.55%
PFG	C	0.54%
EQT	C	0.54%
CAG	D	0.54%
TGT	D	0.54%
DOW	F	0.54%
HPQ	B	0.53%
ES	D	0.53%
FDX	C	0.51%
SYY	D	0.5%
ARE	F	0.48%
HSIC	D	0.48%
LYB	F	0.46%
ELV	F	0.44%
CVX	A	0.44%
NWSA	A	0.39%
LKQ	F	0.38%
ALB	C	0.37%
FOX	A	0.28%
HUM	F	0.25%
NWS	A	0.12%

RPV Underweight 43 Positions Relative to ITB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DHI	D	-14.72%
LEN	D	-11.67%
NVR	D	-7.99%
PHM	D	-7.74%
LOW	B	-4.77%
HD	B	-4.73%
TOL	C	-4.25%
SHW	D	-4.23%
BLD	F	-3.06%
BLDR	F	-2.95%
LII	B	-2.77%
MAS	D	-2.52%
OC	B	-2.22%
TMHC	A	-1.96%
MTH	D	-1.85%
KBH	D	-1.56%
FND	D	-1.55%
FBIN	C	-1.52%
IBP	F	-1.48%
EXP	B	-1.36%
SKY	C	-1.3%
MHO	D	-1.21%
UFPI	C	-1.11%
SSD	F	-1.07%
TPH	D	-1.05%
TREX	B	-0.97%
CVCO	A	-0.94%
AZEK	C	-0.86%
BECN	B	-0.81%
CCS	F	-0.71%
GRBK	D	-0.64%
LGIH	F	-0.59%
LEN	D	-0.5%
MBC	B	-0.32%
HAYW	A	-0.3%
DFH	F	-0.25%
BZH	D	-0.24%
LEG	F	-0.23%
NX	C	-0.2%
AMWD	D	-0.2%
JELD	F	-0.17%
ETD	F	-0.09%
ARHS	F	-0.07%