RMIF vs. BAMU ETF Comparison

Comparison of LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF (RMIF) to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU)
RMIF

LHA Risk-Managed Income ETF

RMIF Description

The fund is an actively-managed "fund of funds" and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in other investment companies, including other actively managed exchange-traded funds ("ETFs") and index-based ETFs (collectively, "Underlying Investments"), that provide exposure to a broad range of fixed income asset classes. The fund may also invest in cash, cash equivalents, or money market funds.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.42

Average Daily Volume

2,568

Number of Holdings *

4

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BAMU

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF

BAMU Description The fund is an actively managed exchange traded fund ("ETF") that, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets in U.S. Treasuries and investment grade corporate bonds with a 0-2 year maturity range, including unaffiliated ETFs purchased in the secondary market that invest substantially all of their assets in such fixed income instruments.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.46

Average Daily Volume

7,794

Number of Holdings *

4

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period RMIF BAMU
30 Days 0.81% 0.28%
60 Days 1.20% 0.63%
90 Days 2.23% 1.04%
12 Months 8.06% 4.28%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in RMIF Weight in BAMU Overlap
Compare ETFs