RFG vs. NBSM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.01

Average Daily Volume

17,226

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

NBSM

Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF

NBSM Description

NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.72

Average Daily Volume

11,356

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	NBSM
30 Days	0.24%	-0.44%
60 Days	4.44%	3.45%
90 Days	4.84%	4.30%
12 Months	29.90%

11 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in NBSM	Overlap
CNX	A	3.52%	2.59%	2.59%
CR	A	0.86%	2.06%	0.86%
EXP	B	1.56%	3.89%	1.56%
FND	F	0.89%	1.06%	0.89%
LECO	C	0.77%	2.05%	0.77%
MANH	D	1.07%	1.16%	1.07%
RBC	A	0.81%	2.91%	0.81%
RYAN	A	2.22%	3.04%	2.22%
SSD	D	1.26%	1.38%	1.26%
TXRH	A	1.27%	1.89%	1.27%
WSO	A	0.87%	3.13%	0.87%

RFG Overweight 75 Positions Relative to NBSM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DUOL	B	3.19%
FIX	A	2.66%
AAON	A	2.23%
TOL	B	2.11%
EME	B	2.04%
MUSA	A	1.72%
BLD	F	1.71%
PR	C	1.65%
APPF	C	1.61%
CLH	C	1.59%
H	B	1.58%
MEDP	D	1.57%
OC	A	1.55%
WING	F	1.53%
KNSL	C	1.5%
LNTH	F	1.47%
WFRD	F	1.47%
FN	C	1.33%
DT	C	1.31%
ELF	C	1.29%
EXEL	B	1.26%
RS	B	1.26%
CHDN	C	1.24%
PK	C	1.21%
ANF	C	1.21%
RMBS	C	1.2%
ONTO	F	1.19%
RRC	B	1.19%
NVT	B	1.18%
SAIA	B	1.18%
LII	B	1.16%
VVV	B	1.16%
ESAB	B	1.13%
CASY	B	1.12%
UFPI	C	1.08%
AIT	A	1.07%
OVV	C	1.05%
COKE	D	1.01%
PRI	A	1.01%
GTLS	A	0.98%
LOPE	B	0.97%
RBA	A	0.96%
WSM	F	0.96%
VAL	F	0.95%
CHRD	F	0.95%
TPX	A	0.95%
NEU	C	0.93%
SKX	D	0.93%
CELH	F	0.9%
PLNT	A	0.9%
ALTR	B	0.87%
WLK	F	0.87%
PSTG	F	0.86%
OLED	F	0.85%
MTDR	C	0.8%
CIVI	F	0.79%
QLYS	C	0.78%
CROX	F	0.77%
HLNE	A	0.76%
WMS	F	0.73%
LNW	D	0.72%
HALO	D	0.7%
TREX	C	0.7%
VNT	B	0.69%
BCO	F	0.65%
PEN	B	0.63%
ENSG	D	0.62%
DBX	C	0.59%
ARWR	D	0.58%
BYD	A	0.57%
FCN	F	0.45%
CAR	C	0.41%
ACHC	F	0.38%
FIVE	F	0.35%
COTY	F	0.34%

RFG Underweight 34 Positions Relative to NBSM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FICO	A	-3.94%
KEX	A	-3.49%
VMI	B	-3.08%
ITT	A	-3.07%
ATR	B	-2.9%
TTEK	D	-2.8%
HAE	A	-2.72%
TYL	B	-2.69%
CHE	D	-2.34%
TTC	D	-2.2%
RLI	A	-2.18%
MKSI	D	-2.18%
CBU	A	-2.15%
LFUS	D	-2.04%
ENTG	F	-1.97%
GGG	A	-1.97%
NXST	D	-1.97%
LSCC	D	-1.9%
TDW	F	-1.89%
TECH	D	-1.87%
CFR	A	-1.81%
TSCO	D	-1.64%
POWI	D	-1.64%
BSY	D	-1.61%
SPSC	D	-1.54%
PB	A	-1.5%
CHD	A	-1.44%
ROL	A	-1.41%
LNT	A	-1.39%
ICLR	F	-1.28%
BFAM	F	-1.23%
IBP	F	-1.18%
CNM	F	-1.07%
AWI	A	-1.02%