RFG vs. IHF ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$49.40

Average Daily Volume

28,488

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

IHF

iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF

IHF Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$55.36

Average Daily Volume

64,968

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	IHF
30 Days	6.13%	-4.90%
60 Days	8.58%	0.93%
90 Days	2.63%	8.10%
12 Months	30.71%	12.95%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in IHF	Overlap
	ACHC	F	0.7%	0.93%	0.7%

RFG Overweight 85 Positions Relative to IHF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CNX	A	2.9%
DUOL	B	2.89%
FIX	A	2.46%
SWN	D	2.15%
RYAN	A	2.13%
TOL	C	2.13%
AAON	A	2.06%
WING	C	2.03%
BLD	D	1.9%
EME	B	1.79%
LNTH	C	1.78%
MUSA	D	1.73%
APPF	C	1.72%
H	B	1.67%
KNSL	B	1.55%
CLH	B	1.54%
ONTO	B	1.54%
MEDP	F	1.49%
PR	D	1.48%
OC	C	1.48%
EXP	C	1.46%
WFRD	F	1.44%
SSD	B	1.31%
DT	B	1.3%
ELF	F	1.27%
PK	D	1.25%
FN	B	1.24%
ANF	D	1.21%
LII	C	1.18%
TXRH	A	1.18%
VVV	D	1.17%
RS	D	1.17%
CHDN	C	1.16%
CROX	C	1.15%
RRC	D	1.13%
WSM	C	1.12%
COKE	C	1.12%
MANH	A	1.1%
NVT	C	1.1%
FND	C	1.09%
UFPI	C	1.08%
CASY	D	1.04%
SKX	B	1.04%
VAL	F	1.02%
OLED	B	0.99%
WLK	C	0.98%
TPX	C	0.98%
SAIA	D	0.96%
OVV	D	0.96%
CELH	F	0.96%
EXEL	B	0.95%
PRI	A	0.95%
NEU	F	0.95%
CHRD	F	0.94%
ESAB	C	0.94%
AIT	B	0.92%
RMBS	F	0.92%
RBA	D	0.89%
LOPE	D	0.87%
WSO	C	0.86%
PSTG	F	0.83%
ALTR	B	0.82%
PLNT	B	0.81%
CR	A	0.8%
RBC	C	0.79%
GTLS	D	0.77%
BCO	C	0.75%
CIVI	F	0.75%
WMS	D	0.74%
LECO	D	0.71%
MTDR	D	0.69%
HLNE	A	0.69%
HALO	D	0.68%
LNW	F	0.67%
TREX	D	0.67%
QLYS	F	0.66%
VNT	F	0.58%
DBX	C	0.55%
ARWR	F	0.55%
PEN	D	0.53%
BYD	B	0.52%
FCN	C	0.51%
COTY	F	0.45%
CAR	D	0.38%
FIVE	D	0.37%

RFG Underweight 66 Positions Relative to IHF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UNH	B	-22.26%
ELV	F	-13.74%
CI	D	-8.08%
CVS	D	-4.94%
HCA	C	-4.68%
CNC	F	-4.58%
HUM	F	-4.39%
VEEV	C	-4.25%
MOH	F	-3.16%
LH	D	-2.94%
DGX	D	-2.72%
THC	D	-2.46%
UHS	D	-2.15%
EHC	C	-1.52%
CHE	D	-1.42%
ENSG	D	-1.29%
DVA	C	-1.19%
HQY	B	-1.1%
DOCS	A	-0.85%
OPCH	F	-0.85%
RDNT	C	-0.71%
SEM	D	-0.58%
HIMS	C	-0.53%
AMED	D	-0.5%
EVH	D	-0.49%
CRVL	C	-0.46%
GH	F	-0.44%
ADUS	D	-0.37%
ASTH	B	-0.37%
SGRY	C	-0.37%
RCM	B	-0.35%
PINC	F	-0.33%
PRVA	F	-0.29%
NEO	F	-0.29%
AMN	F	-0.25%
NHC	D	-0.24%
TDOC	D	-0.23%
PACS	C	-0.23%
BKD	F	-0.21%
PGNY	F	-0.21%
PHR	F	-0.2%
USPH	F	-0.2%
CERT	F	-0.2%
AGL	F	-0.18%
CLOV	B	-0.18%
ALHC	C	-0.18%
SDGR	F	-0.16%
PNTG	C	-0.16%
MD	B	-0.15%
LFST	C	-0.14%
BTSG	C	-0.13%
CSTL	B	-0.12%
HSTM	B	-0.11%
CYH	C	-0.11%
GDRX	F	-0.09%
HCAT	C	-0.08%
SLP	F	-0.08%
OPK	D	-0.08%
CCRN	F	-0.07%
FLGT	F	-0.07%
SHCR	A	-0.07%
DCGO	F	-0.05%
NRC	F	-0.05%
DH	F	-0.04%
ACCD	F	-0.04%
MODV	F	-0.02%