RDFI vs. TBFC ETF Comparison
Comparison of Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) to The Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF (TBFC)
RDFI
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
RDFI Description
The investment seeks total return with an emphasis on providing current income. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in fixed income closed-end funds trading at a discount or premium to their underlying net asset value and that pay regular periodic cash distributions. Through its investments in closed-end funds that hold non-U.S. fixed income securities, the fund may invest indirectly in foreign securities, including securities of issuers located in emerging markets. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$24.26
Average Daily Volume
12,003
32
TBFC
The Brinsmere Fund Conservative ETF
TBFC Description
TBFC is designed to deliver multi-asset exposure while seeking long-term capital appreciation with capital preservation. It holds funds that represent the broad equity and bond markets as selected based on a set of risk-management techniques of two independent proprietary strategies. The Systematic Market Beta Strategy (SMB) and the Classic Asset Allocation Revisited Strategy (CAAR) are rules-based, tactical asset allocation investment strategies used to systematically rebalance the funds holdings. The former aims to reduce risk and enhance performance based on market risk assessments, while the latter seeks tactical adaptation to changing market conditions using mean-variance optimization. The fund employs a conservative model of CAAR with a 20% equity floor target and a 40% equity cap. Both strategies are re-evaluated and rebalanced monthly. TBGC launched alongside its sister fund, TBFG, which seeks a growth-focused portfolio.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.94
Average Daily Volume
1,056
9
Performance
Period | RDFI | TBFC |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 0.87% | 0.13% |
60 Days | -2.29% | -0.13% |
90 Days | -0.07% | 2.26% |
12 Months | 14.98% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in RDFI | Weight in TBFC | Overlap |
---|
RDFI Overweight 32 Positions Relative to TBFC
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
NPFD | A | 5.43% | |
EDD | D | 4.84% | |
PDX | A | 4.6% | |
HIO | B | 4.13% | |
EMD | C | 3.83% | |
ZROZ | F | 3.68% | |
TEI | D | 3.51% | |
NZF | C | 3.32% | |
FPF | C | 3.13% | |
NAD | B | 2.65% | |
CARY | C | 2.62% | |
BTZ | C | 2.56% | |
EAD | C | 2.52% | |
RA | B | 2.37% | |
NVG | C | 2.31% | |
ERC | C | 2.19% | |
BLE | D | 2.07% | |
VMO | D | 1.95% | |
NEA | C | 1.9% | |
FTF | B | 1.9% | |
EMB | C | 1.83% | |
MMU | C | 1.81% | |
IQI | D | 1.62% | |
HIX | B | 1.34% | |
VKQ | D | 1.3% | |
EHI | C | 1.28% | |
GHY | A | 1.19% | |
BIL | A | 1.08% | |
MBB | C | 1.0% | |
MYD | D | 0.89% | |
MHD | C | 0.39% | |
IIM | D | 0.25% |
RDFI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
TBFC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords