QVAL vs. XITK ETF Comparison

Comparison of ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) to SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK)
QVAL

ValueShares U.S. Quantitative Value ETF

QVAL Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF. Under normal circumstances, it seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in U.S. equity securities that the Adviser believes, based on quantitative analysis, are undervalued at the time of purchase and have the potential for capital appreciation. The fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of U.S. companies. It will invest primarily in the exchange-listed common stock of U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.93

Average Daily Volume

23,105

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XITK

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

XITK Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index. The index is designed to represent the performance of U.S.-listed stock and American Depository Receipts of Technology companies and Technology-related companies within the most innovative segments of the Technology sector and Electronic Media sub-sector of the Media sector, as defined by FactSet Research Systems, Inc. The fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$147.39

Average Daily Volume

4,402

Number of Holdings *

98

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period QVAL XITK
30 Days -2.76% 5.03%
60 Days 0.10% 4.04%
90 Days -2.59% 2.22%
12 Months 26.03% 11.48%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in QVAL Weight in XITK Overlap
CTSH C 1.98% 0.94% 0.94%
QVAL Overweight 49 Positions Relative to XITK
Symbol Grade Weight
THC B 2.05%
WFRD B 2.05%
CMCSA D 2.04%
SIG F 2.04%
APA D 2.03%
DAL D 2.02%
TEX D 2.02%
FANG A 2.02%
MAT F 2.01%
TMHC D 2.01%
PBF D 2.01%
T B 2.01%
LBRT D 2.01%
ARCH C 2.01%
AGCO F 2.01%
ALSN C 2.01%
VLO C 2.01%
ELV C 2.01%
OMC D 2.01%
LEA F 2.01%
HPQ C 2.0%
KHC D 2.0%
CVI F 2.0%
FOXA A 2.0%
IPG F 2.0%
CNC D 2.0%
PHM D 2.0%
TAP F 2.0%
BG B 2.0%
ON D 2.0%
MOH F 2.0%
OC D 1.99%
DINO D 1.99%
INSW B 1.99%
PCAR D 1.99%
UFPI D 1.99%
TOL D 1.99%
ULTA D 1.99%
UTHR B 1.99%
HAL F 1.98%
CRI F 1.97%
MO A 1.97%
CROX C 1.97%
SNA F 1.97%
GPK D 1.96%
PVH F 1.94%
CEIX B 1.93%
JBL F 1.93%
SM D 1.8%
QVAL Underweight 97 Positions Relative to XITK
Symbol Grade Weight
SMCI C -2.96%
NVDA B -2.51%
APP A -2.08%
PI C -1.73%
TOST C -1.6%
SPOT B -1.55%
CRWD A -1.54%
HCP A -1.53%
ONTO B -1.5%
QTWO C -1.47%
MGNI B -1.47%
META B -1.45%
KLAC B -1.44%
NFLX A -1.4%
MPWR A -1.37%
TTD A -1.32%
KD B -1.32%
ARLO B -1.28%
CYBR B -1.24%
PINS B -1.23%
DAKT B -1.23%
MNDY B -1.21%
AMD B -1.19%
OKTA C -1.18%
AGYS A -1.15%
PRFT B -1.1%
PUBM D -1.09%
PEGA D -1.09%
DOCS C -1.08%
PAR B -1.08%
AEIS C -1.07%
FTNT D -1.07%
SSNC B -1.05%
VEEV F -1.04%
SEIC C -1.04%
SITM B -1.02%
NCNO C -1.02%
CHKP A -1.02%
MXL B -1.01%
DDOG B -1.0%
DOCN D -0.99%
DOCU D -0.99%
EA B -0.97%
SPSC B -0.97%
VRNS B -0.95%
Z C -0.94%
TENB D -0.94%
PDFS B -0.94%
GFS C -0.93%
INTA B -0.93%
SMAR B -0.92%
DUOL F -0.92%
CWAN C -0.91%
ASGN D -0.91%
SQ D -0.89%
G D -0.88%
ZS B -0.87%
ALIT F -0.87%
DOX D -0.86%
RAMP D -0.85%
IOT C -0.84%
JAMF D -0.84%
RBLX B -0.83%
CALX C -0.81%
FVRR D -0.81%
LSPD F -0.77%
APPN D -0.76%
DT F -0.76%
S D -0.75%
TDC C -0.75%
TWLO D -0.75%
ZI F -0.75%
GLOB C -0.73%
UPWK D -0.72%
OLO F -0.72%
PRO F -0.72%
GTLB D -0.7%
QLYS D -0.69%
CLVT D -0.67%
IAS D -0.65%
EPAM D -0.65%
RPD C -0.64%
BRZE D -0.62%
ASAN D -0.62%
ZIP F -0.61%
CNXC C -0.59%
UPST F -0.58%
MDB D -0.57%
RIOT F -0.55%
DV F -0.54%
ROKU D -0.5%
U F -0.47%
OPEN F -0.46%
PATH F -0.46%
FSLY F -0.39%
APPS F -0.22%
YNDX C -0.0%
Compare ETFs