QUVU vs. SIMS ETF Comparison

Comparison of Hartford Quality Value ETF (QUVU) to SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS)

QUVU

Hartford Quality Value ETF

QUVU Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in common stocks of issuers located in the United States. The fund may invest in a broad range of market capitalizations, but tends to focus on large capitalization companies with market capitalizations similar to those of companies in the Russell 1000 Value Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.85

Average Daily Volume

5,461

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SIMS

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF

SIMS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Intelligent Infrastructure sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.91

Average Daily Volume

1,191

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QUVU	SIMS
30 Days	1.94%	5.33%
60 Days	3.58%	7.98%
90 Days	4.59%	6.18%
12 Months	23.79%	17.43%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in QUVU	Weight in SIMS	Overlap
	HON	B	1.85%	1.8%	1.8%
	ROP	B	0.76%	1.64%	0.76%

QUVU Overweight 62 Positions Relative to SIMS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
JPM	A	3.9%
WFC	A	3.43%
UNH	C	3.41%
MS	A	2.99%
PM	B	2.8%
AXP	A	2.69%
EOG	A	2.25%
WMB	A	2.19%
BAC	A	2.18%
KNX	B	2.1%
OMC	C	2.09%
CSCO	B	2.05%
MDT	D	1.95%
CTSH	B	1.88%
UL	D	1.8%
CVX	A	1.8%
ATO	A	1.79%
PFE	D	1.78%
AEP	D	1.67%
LMT	D	1.64%
MMC	B	1.62%
DUK	C	1.61%
PFG	D	1.61%
AZN	D	1.59%
SRE	A	1.58%
TTE	F	1.57%
ACN	C	1.56%
QCOM	F	1.51%
ELV	F	1.45%
TXN	C	1.38%
DIS	B	1.37%
AMT	D	1.32%
CMCSA	B	1.31%
NVS	D	1.3%
BDX	F	1.3%
LKQ	D	1.29%
WAB	B	1.28%
CB	C	1.27%
KDP	D	1.26%
FMC	D	1.26%
AIG	B	1.24%
NXPI	D	1.19%
ARMK	B	1.19%
SPG	B	1.14%
MRK	F	1.12%
DAL	C	1.1%
TSN	B	1.06%
GOOGL	C	0.98%
OTIS	C	0.98%
AMCR	D	0.96%
SYY	B	0.91%
CTRA	B	0.91%
PSA	D	0.91%
TJX	A	0.9%
BHP	F	0.88%
HST	C	0.83%
MDLZ	F	0.82%
MET	A	0.67%
KVUE	A	0.65%
LOW	D	0.59%
CE	F	0.41%
GILD	C	0.3%

QUVU Underweight 39 Positions Relative to SIMS

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MWA	B	-3.62%
PNR	A	-3.52%
GNRC	B	-3.47%
WTTR	B	-3.34%
REZI	A	-3.31%
JCI	C	-3.18%
CARR	D	-3.09%
BMI	B	-3.08%
ITRI	B	-2.88%
VLTO	D	-2.71%
ADTN	A	-2.66%
TTEK	F	-2.55%
ALRM	C	-2.51%
XYL	D	-2.3%
BE	B	-2.29%
SLAB	D	-2.28%
ARLO	C	-2.23%
ROKU	D	-2.14%
PSN	D	-2.12%
AYI	B	-2.08%
SHLS	F	-1.96%
ERII	D	-1.94%
GTLS	B	-1.88%
NRG	B	-1.85%
AME	A	-1.81%
CHPT	F	-1.64%
AY	B	-1.63%
NVEE	F	-1.57%
BIDU	F	-1.45%
ON	D	-1.43%
GNTX	C	-1.42%
CNM	D	-1.34%
BP	D	-1.33%
BLNK	F	-1.25%
CWCO	C	-1.03%
MVIS	F	-0.99%
STM	F	-0.94%
STEM	F	-0.65%
REKR	F	-0.47%