QQJG vs. FLCH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) to Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH)

QQJG

Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF

QQJG Description

Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Invesco Capital Management LLC. It invests in the public equity markets across the globe. The fund invests in the stocks of companies operating across communication services, consumer discretionary, consumer staples, energy, health care, industrials, information technology, materials, real estate, utilities sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of large cap companies. The fund invests in stocks of companies that are deemed socially conscious in their business dealings and directly promote environmental responsibility. It replicates the performance of the Nasdaq Next Generation 100 ESG Index, by using full replication technique. Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$21.76

Average Daily Volume

762

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

FLCH

Franklin FTSE China ETF

FLCH Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that closely correspond the FTSE China RIC Capped Index (the FTSE China Capped Index). Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the index and in depositary receipts representing such securities. The index is based on the FTSE China Index and is designed to measure the performance of Chinese large- and mid-capitalization stocks, as represented by H-Shares and B-Shares. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$15.97

Average Daily Volume

23,632

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QQJG	FLCH
30 Days	4.46%	-0.31%
60 Days	-1.27%	-3.94%
90 Days	0.96%	-6.59%
12 Months	12.56%	-5.32%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in QQJG	Weight in FLCH	Overlap
	BGNE	B	0.51%	0.47%	0.47%
	TCOM	A	0.89%	1.24%	0.89%

QQJG Overweight 83 Positions Relative to FLCH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MPWR	C	3.51%
TSCO	B	2.77%
EBAY	A	2.45%
NTAP	D	2.23%
ICLR	D	2.23%
WDC	D	2.19%
STX	D	2.07%
FSLR	C	1.98%
APP	B	1.95%
ZBRA	C	1.91%
TER	D	1.76%
CHKP	B	1.75%
ZM	B	1.68%
JBHT	C	1.67%
PTC	D	1.65%
ULTA	D	1.54%
ALNY	C	1.54%
LOGI	D	1.53%
TRMB	D	1.47%
FLEX	C	1.47%
AKAM	D	1.43%
POOL	C	1.43%
ALGN	F	1.37%
MANH	B	1.34%
BSY	D	1.3%
VRSN	C	1.28%
ENTG	D	1.26%
TTEK	B	1.2%
SSNC	B	1.2%
ENPH	D	1.18%
OKTA	F	1.18%
LKQ	D	1.17%
EXPE	C	1.12%
NTNX	A	1.12%
NWSA	C	1.1%
HOLX	A	1.08%
UTHR	B	1.02%
SNY	A	1.02%
BMRN	D	1.01%
DOCU	A	0.99%
FFIV	B	0.99%
JKHY	B	0.98%
TECH	D	0.97%
CHRW	B	0.96%
SWKS	D	0.96%
MEDP	D	0.95%
FOXA	B	0.95%
DOX	C	0.94%
FOX	B	0.9%
PODD	A	0.89%
ARGX	A	0.85%
HSIC	C	0.85%
NBIX	D	0.82%
SAIA	D	0.82%
NICE	F	0.82%
NDSN	C	0.81%
NTES	F	0.79%
MTCH	B	0.77%
OTEX	C	0.74%
ROKU	C	0.73%
LECO	F	0.73%
BRKR	C	0.73%
RGEN	C	0.73%
QRVO	D	0.71%
INCY	C	0.71%
JD	D	0.67%
GRAB	D	0.67%
VTRS	C	0.65%
Z	B	0.64%
RPRX	B	0.58%
STLD	D	0.57%
LBRDK	C	0.57%
NWS	C	0.57%
PCTY	C	0.54%
ETSY	F	0.54%
LCID	B	0.52%
LSCC	F	0.51%
BNTX	C	0.5%
RIVN	F	0.44%
UAL	C	0.42%
JAZZ	D	0.39%
FIVE	F	0.28%
ZG	B	0.2%

QQJG Underweight 24 Positions Relative to FLCH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BABA	B	-8.62%
PDD	F	-3.3%
BIDU	F	-1.17%
YUMC	C	-0.64%
LI	F	-0.51%
BEKE	C	-0.45%
TME	F	-0.33%
NIO	D	-0.26%
YMM	D	-0.24%
XPEV	C	-0.24%
VIPS	F	-0.21%
BZ	F	-0.2%
BILI	C	-0.2%
TAL	F	-0.16%
QFIN	B	-0.15%
ATHM	A	-0.08%
RLX	D	-0.07%
GDS	A	-0.07%
YY	A	-0.05%
IQ	F	-0.05%
DQ	D	-0.04%
WB	F	-0.03%
TUYA	F	-0.02%
DADA	F	-0.0%