QLTY vs. RSPH ETF Comparison
Comparison of GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH)
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
QLTY Description
QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.53
Average Daily Volume
265,453
34
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
RSPH Description
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500® Health Care Index, an index that contains the common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500® Index that are classified as members of the health care sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS).Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.68
Average Daily Volume
61,343
61
Performance
| Period | QLTY | RSPH |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 1.40% | -1.00% |
| 60 Days | 0.46% | -4.48% |
| 90 Days | 2.30% | -3.57% |
| 12 Months | 26.48% | 12.19% |
10 Overlapping Holdings
QLTY Overweight 24 Positions Relative to RSPH
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | F | 6.46% | |
| AAPL | C | 5.33% | |
| ORCL | B | 4.71% | |
| META | D | 4.5% | |
| GOOGL | C | 4.43% | |
| TXN | C | 3.53% | |
| ACN | C | 3.3% | |
| V | A | 3.22% | |
| PG | A | 3.2% | |
| KLAC | D | 2.85% | |
| LRCX | F | 2.85% | |
| CRM | B | 2.84% | |
| KO | D | 2.81% | |
| HLT | A | 2.62% | |
| ARMK | B | 2.56% | |
| WFC | A | 2.45% | |
| AVGO | D | 2.45% | |
| AMZN | C | 2.4% | |
| USB | A | 2.31% | |
| OTIS | C | 2.25% | |
| TJX | A | 2.14% | |
| GE | D | 1.73% | |
| MDLZ | F | 1.72% | |
| STZ | D | 1.59% |
QLTY Underweight 51 Positions Relative to RSPH
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| INCY | C | -2.08% | |
| BMY | B | -2.02% | |
| MCK | B | -2.0% | |
| WAT | B | -1.96% | |
| WST | C | -1.91% | |
| PODD | C | -1.9% | |
| GILD | C | -1.89% | |
| VTRS | A | -1.84% | |
| DXCM | D | -1.83% | |
| LH | C | -1.83% | |
| CAH | B | -1.82% | |
| BSX | B | -1.79% | |
| SYK | C | -1.76% | |
| ZBH | C | -1.74% | |
| COR | B | -1.72% | |
| VRTX | F | -1.69% | |
| CTLT | B | -1.68% | |
| CRL | C | -1.68% | |
| SOLV | C | -1.65% | |
| BDX | F | -1.65% | |
| TECH | D | -1.65% | |
| EW | C | -1.64% | |
| RVTY | F | -1.62% | |
| GEHC | F | -1.62% | |
| MDT | D | -1.62% | |
| HOLX | D | -1.62% | |
| HSIC | B | -1.61% | |
| A | D | -1.61% | |
| CVS | D | -1.61% | |
| DVA | B | -1.6% | |
| RMD | C | -1.58% | |
| ALGN | D | -1.55% | |
| ZTS | D | -1.55% | |
| STE | F | -1.54% | |
| MTD | D | -1.52% | |
| PFE | D | -1.51% | |
| AMGN | D | -1.51% | |
| HUM | C | -1.5% | |
| HCA | F | -1.49% | |
| DHR | F | -1.48% | |
| ABBV | D | -1.48% | |
| UHS | D | -1.47% | |
| MOH | F | -1.45% | |
| IDXX | F | -1.44% | |
| IQV | D | -1.44% | |
| BIIB | F | -1.43% | |
| BAX | D | -1.36% | |
| TFX | F | -1.32% | |
| CNC | D | -1.32% | |
| REGN | F | -1.15% | |
| MRNA | F | -0.99% |
QLTY: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RSPH: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
