PWER vs. NIKL ETF Comparison

Comparison of Macquarie Energy Transition ETF (PWER) to Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL)
PWER

Macquarie Energy Transition ETF

PWER Description

The ETF seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in a diversified portfolio of securities in the energy, materials, industrial, renewable energy, and utilities sectors that meet the fund"s investment criteria.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.29

Average Daily Volume

790

Number of Holdings *

7

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
NIKL

Sprott Nickel Miners ETF

NIKL Description The fund will, under normal circumstances, invest at least 80% of its total assets in securities of the index. The index is designed to track the performance of companies that derive at least 50% of their revenue and/or assets from (i) mining, exploration, development, or production of nickel ("Nickel Mining Companies"); (ii) investments in nickel that represent all or a significant portion of their assets, and/or (iii) supplying nickel. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$13.61

Average Daily Volume

15,615

Number of Holdings *

5

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PWER NIKL
30 Days 8.45% 14.18%
60 Days 10.25% 17.53%
90 Days 3.11% 0.67%
12 Months -22.89%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PWER Weight in NIKL Overlap
Compare ETFs