PJFM vs. UTES ETF Comparison

Comparison of PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) to Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES)

PJFM

PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF

PJFM Description

Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of the fund's investable assets in equity and equity-related securities of medium-sized companies. The subadviser uses a combination of fundamental research and systematic portfolio construction. The fund's managers consider medium-sized companies to be those with market capitalizations that are within the market capitalization range of the Russell Midcap Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$62.41

Average Daily Volume

197

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

UTES

Reaves Utilities ETF

UTES Description

ETFis Series Trust I - Reaves Utilities ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Virtus ETF Advisers LLC. The fund is co-managed by W. H. Reaves & Co., Inc. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating in the utilities sector. It invests in dividend yielding stocks of companies across all market capitalization. The fund employs fundamental analysis with a bottom-up stock picking approach with a focus on factors such as conservative capital structures, solid balance sheets, history of and/or potential for growing earnings and raising dividends, lower-than-market levels of volatility, correlation or similar characteristics earnings and cash flow potential, dividend prospects and tax treatment of dividends, strength of business franchises and estimates of net asset value to create its portfolio. ETFis Series Trust I - Reaves Utilities ETF is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$69.05

Average Daily Volume

86,356

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PJFM	UTES
30 Days	8.67%	5.44%
60 Days	11.41%	8.91%
90 Days	14.93%	21.87%
12 Months		59.87%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in PJFM	Weight in UTES	Overlap
	CMS	C	1.85%	2.68%	1.85%
	NI	A	4.19%	3.82%	3.82%

PJFM Overweight 40 Positions Relative to UTES

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GLPI	C	4.67%
FOUR	B	4.26%
TRGP	B	4.07%
CHDN	B	3.75%
MKL	A	3.68%
WTFC	A	3.29%
CCK	C	3.29%
EWBC	A	3.03%
LNG	B	2.98%
HLT	A	2.97%
BURL	A	2.96%
GTES	A	2.78%
RL	B	2.74%
KEX	C	2.65%
PR	B	2.54%
LHX	C	2.45%
AXS	A	2.44%
GNRC	B	2.4%
ALSN	B	2.17%
VRT	B	2.02%
CYBR	B	1.95%
IRT	A	1.89%
LFUS	F	1.87%
NTRA	B	1.87%
RNR	C	1.81%
CBRE	B	1.79%
KBR	F	1.58%
PFGC	B	1.57%
NBIX	C	1.53%
ESNT	D	1.5%
LPLA	A	1.42%
MNDY	C	1.34%
RYAN	B	1.12%
PINS	D	1.05%
ENTG	D	1.03%
COHR	B	0.97%
OLED	D	0.89%
EHC	B	0.88%
HEI	B	0.56%
PCVX	D	0.55%

PJFM Underweight 14 Positions Relative to UTES

Symbol	Grade	Weight
NEE	D	-14.41%
VST	B	-13.81%
CEG	D	-10.62%
SRE	A	-5.08%
ETR	B	-4.74%
PNW	B	-4.63%
PEG	A	-4.51%
PPL	B	-4.4%
ATO	A	-4.39%
XEL	A	-4.26%
PNM	F	-4.21%
IDA	A	-3.87%
DTE	C	-3.69%
CNP	B	-1.69%