PCIG vs. RSPC ETF Comparison
Comparison of Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC)
PCIG
Polen Capital International Growth ETF
PCIG Description
PCIG aims to deliver sustainable, above-average earnings growth and long-term stock price appreciation within the global ex-US equity market. The strategy is rooted in fundamental research, selecting 25-35 large-cap growth companies with a sustainable edge like consistent earnings growth, robust balance sheets, and shareholder-oriented management teams. Such companies are selected within industries characterized by high barriers to entry, such as those requiring substantial capital investment, government approvals, or significant intellectual property. Moreover, it integrates ESG factors into the investment process. While the fund may concentrate investments in the consumer discretionary and financial sectors, it avoids over-concentration in any one industry. Investments are typically held for the long term but are subject to period review and potential sale based on changing market conditions, company performance, or perceived threats to competitive advantage.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$9.52
Average Daily Volume
5,603
10
RSPC
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF
RSPC Description
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500® Communication Services Index, an index that contains the common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500® Index that are classified as members of the communication services sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$35.40
Average Daily Volume
10,611
25
Performance
| Period | PCIG | RSPC |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -1.19% | 8.39% |
| 60 Days | -3.79% | 10.17% |
| 90 Days | -4.23% | 12.16% |
| 12 Months | 27.06% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in PCIG | Weight in RSPC | Overlap |
|---|
PCIG Underweight 25 Positions Relative to RSPC
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LYV | A | -5.71% | |
| NFLX | A | -5.24% | |
| DIS | B | -5.21% | |
| TTWO | A | -5.04% | |
| WBD | C | -4.84% | |
| TMUS | B | -4.8% | |
| TKO | B | -4.76% | |
| EA | A | -4.73% | |
| CHTR | C | -4.73% | |
| CMCSA | B | -4.49% | |
| META | D | -4.45% | |
| T | A | -4.36% | |
| PARA | C | -4.14% | |
| OMC | C | -4.09% | |
| NYT | C | -4.01% | |
| FYBR | D | -3.94% | |
| VZ | C | -3.93% | |
| IPG | D | -3.8% | |
| MTCH | D | -3.59% | |
| NWSA | B | -3.51% | |
| FOXA | B | -3.08% | |
| GOOGL | C | -2.53% | |
| GOOG | C | -2.09% | |
| FOX | A | -1.72% | |
| NWS | B | -1.13% |
PCIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
RSPC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
