PCIG vs. DIVP ETF Comparison
Comparison of Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) to Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF (DIVP)
PCIG
Polen Capital International Growth ETF
PCIG Description
PCIG aims to deliver sustainable, above-average earnings growth and long-term stock price appreciation within the global ex-US equity market. The strategy is rooted in fundamental research, selecting 25-35 large-cap growth companies with a sustainable edge like consistent earnings growth, robust balance sheets, and shareholder-oriented management teams. Such companies are selected within industries characterized by high barriers to entry, such as those requiring substantial capital investment, government approvals, or significant intellectual property. Moreover, it integrates ESG factors into the investment process. While the fund may concentrate investments in the consumer discretionary and financial sectors, it avoids over-concentration in any one industry. Investments are typically held for the long term but are subject to period review and potential sale based on changing market conditions, company performance, or perceived threats to competitive advantage.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$9.34
Average Daily Volume
5,433
10
DIVP
Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF
DIVP Description
DIVP invests in large- and mid-cap value stocks that generally have higher dividend yield than the average of the funds US benchmark. The fund identifies value stocks that have low price-to-earnings ratio with above-average earnings and dividend growth potential. Companies are screened using fundamental research. The fund may invest up to 30% in non-US companies in the form of ADRs. While the portfolio is not rebalanced systematically, weighting is roughly equal to avoid overweighting of individual securities. To generate additional income, the fund selectively writes covered call options with a target range of between 25-40%. However, the covered call overlay limits participation in potential gains if shares increase in value. The adviser may sell stocks that are no longer viewed as attractive based on growth potential, dividend yield, or price. As an actively managed ETF, the fund manager has full discretion to make buy, hold, or sell decisions at any time.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.25
Average Daily Volume
1,461
32
Performance
| Period | PCIG | DIVP |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -5.74% | -1.04% |
| 60 Days | -7.51% | -0.27% |
| 90 Days | -0.62% | 4.23% |
| 12 Months |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in PCIG | Weight in DIVP | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDT | B | 5.31% | 4.07% | 4.07% |
PCIG Underweight 31 Positions Relative to DIVP
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSCO | B | -4.27% | |
| EOG | D | -4.0% | |
| VICI | D | -3.98% | |
| DUK | C | -3.83% | |
| BMY | A | -3.68% | |
| PM | A | -3.56% | |
| PPL | C | -3.53% | |
| CAG | D | -3.45% | |
| MRK | F | -3.33% | |
| VZ | D | -3.29% | |
| CVX | A | -3.23% | |
| KVUE | B | -3.17% | |
| XOM | C | -3.17% | |
| TFC | C | -3.11% | |
| BAC | B | -3.07% | |
| C | A | -3.07% | |
| CMCSA | A | -3.07% | |
| BAX | F | -3.07% | |
| DOC | C | -3.07% | |
| RTX | C | -3.02% | |
| SYY | D | -2.88% | |
| IBM | C | -2.71% | |
| MO | A | -2.44% | |
| DOW | F | -2.38% | |
| JCI | B | -2.29% | |
| JPM | A | -2.22% | |
| TRV | B | -2.19% | |
| GD | C | -2.07% | |
| RIO | B | -1.92% | |
| UPS | C | -1.81% | |
| GPC | F | -1.64% |
PCIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
DIVP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
