OCFS vs. SOLR ETF Comparison

Comparison of Professionally Managed Portfolios Otter Creek Focus Strategy ETF (OCFS) to SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SOLR)

OCFS

Professionally Managed Portfolios Otter Creek Focus Strategy ETF

OCFS Description

The fund is an actively-managed ETF that invests in U.S.-listed equity securities of small- and mid-capitalization companies. The fund invests primarily in publicly traded stocks of U.S. companies which the Advisor considers to have a small to mid-size market capitalization. The fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in U.S. dollar denominated foreign equity securities, including through American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") issued by U.S. depository banks, which are traded on U.S. exchanges.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.91

Average Daily Volume

1,209

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SOLR

SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF

SOLR Description

SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management, Inc. The fund is co-managed by Penserra Capital Management, LLC. The fund invests in public equity markets of global region. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across energy and sustainable energy companies sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. The fund invests in stocks of companies that directly promote environmental responsibility. The fund employs fundamental analysis to create its portfolio. It employs proprietary research to create its portfolio. SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF was formed on November 11, 2020 and is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.38

Average Daily Volume

387

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	OCFS	SOLR
30 Days	-4.50%	-6.84%
60 Days	3.24%	-5.79%
90 Days	8.10%	-2.99%
12 Months		5.23%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in OCFS	Weight in SOLR	Overlap
	HUBB	B	2.1%	5.23%	2.1%

OCFS Overweight 19 Positions Relative to SOLR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
VRT	A	8.85%
COHR	B	6.64%
PSN	C	6.22%
PWR	A	5.13%
FLEX	B	4.62%
DT	C	4.49%
GLW	B	4.4%
MMM	D	4.3%
LHX	B	4.25%
TTEK	D	3.88%
BRO	B	3.68%
CLH	C	3.6%
WRB	A	3.34%
GEHC	D	3.26%
AVTR	F	3.16%
VLTO	D	3.14%
PTC	B	3.12%
NDAQ	A	2.95%
CMPO	C	1.99%

OCFS Underweight 18 Positions Relative to SOLR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ETN	A	-4.82%
TT	A	-4.72%
NEE	C	-4.45%
ITRI	B	-4.22%
OC	A	-3.93%
ORA	B	-3.9%
ON	F	-3.38%
NXPI	F	-3.16%
IBP	F	-3.06%
FSLR	F	-2.98%
ST	F	-2.83%
APTV	F	-2.43%
THRM	F	-1.97%
AMRC	F	-1.94%
CSIQ	F	-1.56%
ENPH	F	-1.16%
SEDG	F	-0.17%
TPIC	F	-0.14%