NBSM vs. BUSA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) to Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA)
NBSM

Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF

NBSM Description

NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.75

Average Daily Volume

11,547

Number of Holdings *

47

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

BUSA Description The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to attain its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities of U.S. companies. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes), measured at the time of purchase, in securities of U.S. companies.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.62

Average Daily Volume

25,043

Number of Holdings *

55

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period NBSM BUSA
30 Days 5.91% 4.78%
60 Days 5.08% 6.46%
90 Days 6.00% 6.78%
12 Months 29.83%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in NBSM Weight in BUSA Overlap
GTES A 1.0% 1.01% 1.0%
NBSM Overweight 46 Positions Relative to BUSA
Symbol Grade Weight
EXP A 3.83%
FICO B 3.76%
KEX C 3.67%
WSO A 3.25%
ITT A 3.14%
VMI B 3.13%
RYAN B 3.09%
RBC A 3.04%
ATR B 2.86%
CNX A 2.81%
HAE C 2.73%
TYL B 2.68%
TTEK F 2.42%
CHE D 2.38%
RLI B 2.35%
CBU B 2.2%
CR A 2.16%
TTC D 2.13%
MKSI C 2.09%
LECO B 1.96%
LFUS F 1.91%
TXRH C 1.9%
ENTG D 1.86%
CFR B 1.84%
LSCC D 1.79%
NXST C 1.78%
TECH D 1.72%
PB A 1.59%
LNT A 1.57%
POWI D 1.57%
CHD B 1.57%
TSCO D 1.56%
SPSC C 1.52%
TDW F 1.51%
BSY D 1.5%
ROL B 1.45%
SSD D 1.35%
ICLR D 1.23%
IBP D 1.16%
BFAM D 1.16%
MANH D 1.13%
FND C 1.11%
AWI A 1.06%
CNM D 1.06%
CVLT B 0.51%
ACA A 0.39%
NBSM Underweight 54 Positions Relative to BUSA
Symbol Grade Weight
FI A -3.53%
CVX A -3.36%
MCK B -3.11%
WFC A -2.9%
BAC A -2.86%
FLEX A -2.58%
PNC B -2.57%
CMCSA B -2.48%
GOOG C -2.41%
WTW B -2.4%
C A -2.38%
DOX D -2.34%
CI F -2.26%
FDX B -2.24%
JPM A -2.2%
CTVA C -2.18%
HAL C -2.11%
EMR A -2.1%
CTSH B -2.06%
TXT D -2.05%
OMC C -2.04%
SSNC B -2.02%
SNY F -1.96%
PFE D -1.95%
BK A -1.95%
MRK F -1.92%
WRB A -1.91%
JNJ D -1.77%
INGR B -1.69%
HCA F -1.68%
AIG B -1.61%
CAH B -1.57%
ETR B -1.55%
KVUE A -1.53%
LH C -1.49%
ACGL D -1.44%
AZO C -1.43%
MU D -1.31%
STT A -1.28%
CVS D -1.19%
LKQ D -1.15%
WKC D -1.09%
KNX B -1.08%
TFC A -1.08%
CSCO B -1.06%
OMF A -1.02%
SLB C -0.99%
BRK.A B -0.98%
SYY B -0.96%
GD F -0.91%
JCI C -0.87%
MHK D -0.83%
OTEX D -0.54%
QRVO F -0.5%
Compare ETFs