MVPA vs. LGHT ETF Comparison
Comparison of Advisor Managed Portfolios Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF (MVPA) to Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT)
MVPA
Advisor Managed Portfolios Miller Value Partners Appreciation ETF
MVPA Description
The fund is an actively-managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing in securities that Miller Value Partners, LLC (the "Adviser") believes have an above-average probability of outperforming the S&P 500® Index (the "S&P 500") over a multi-year time horizon. It will typically invest in a portfolio of approximately 20-40 common stocks without regard to market capitalization. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.89
Average Daily Volume
3,988
30
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
LGHT Description
LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$10.28
Average Daily Volume
686
31
Performance
| Period | MVPA | LGHT |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 2.28% | -3.23% |
| 60 Days | 4.40% | -3.02% |
| 90 Days | 7.47% | 2.70% |
| 12 Months |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in MVPA | Weight in LGHT | Overlap |
|---|
MVPA Overweight 30 Positions Relative to LGHT
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNC | D | 7.77% | |
| TTE | F | 6.71% | |
| CPNG | B | 5.77% | |
| BFH | C | 5.61% | |
| CTO | B | 5.35% | |
| JXN | B | 4.79% | |
| PYPL | B | 4.03% | |
| CROX | F | 3.76% | |
| ZD | F | 3.69% | |
| IBTA | A | 3.66% | |
| MSTR | B | 3.62% | |
| CTRN | C | 3.21% | |
| T | A | 3.11% | |
| ATKR | F | 2.97% | |
| WAL | C | 2.71% | |
| FOUR | B | 2.41% | |
| FTI | B | 2.38% | |
| PRDO | B | 2.32% | |
| ARLP | A | 2.19% | |
| ABNB | B | 2.15% | |
| QUAD | A | 2.12% | |
| TOST | A | 2.1% | |
| BLDR | F | 2.09% | |
| LNC | A | 2.02% | |
| VTRS | B | 1.96% | |
| MTCH | C | 1.91% | |
| LAD | A | 1.63% | |
| BKE | C | 1.47% | |
| SMLR | C | 0.42% | |
| CHRD | F | 0.09% |
MVPA Underweight 31 Positions Relative to LGHT
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISRG | B | -14.59% | |
| GEHC | D | -9.12% | |
| RMD | A | -7.12% | |
| IQV | F | -6.5% | |
| DXCM | C | -5.26% | |
| PHG | D | -5.01% | |
| VEEV | B | -4.73% | |
| PODD | A | -4.72% | |
| BNTX | B | -3.9% | |
| ZBH | C | -3.55% | |
| ALGN | F | -2.67% | |
| MRNA | F | -2.38% | |
| MASI | A | -2.24% | |
| DOCS | A | -1.67% | |
| PRCT | A | -1.35% | |
| TNDM | F | -0.6% | |
| ALKS | F | -0.6% | |
| OMCL | B | -0.45% | |
| EVH | D | -0.41% | |
| IRTC | C | -0.39% | |
| PRVA | B | -0.38% | |
| LFST | C | -0.3% | |
| TDOC | C | -0.29% | |
| PGNY | F | -0.28% | |
| GDRX | F | -0.27% | |
| ALHC | A | -0.2% | |
| SDGR | F | -0.19% | |
| PHR | F | -0.15% | |
| ACCD | F | -0.06% | |
| TBRG | A | -0.03% | |
| MODV | F | -0.03% |
MVPA: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
LGHT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
