MUSQ vs. SMCO ETF Comparison

Comparison of MUSQ Global Music Industry ETF (MUSQ) to Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF (SMCO)
MUSQ

MUSQ Global Music Industry ETF

MUSQ Description

The index is comprised of publicly-traded global companies that generate at least 50% of their annual revenue or $1 billion in annual sales from one or more of the sub-segments of the global music industry. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities of Global Music Investments. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.69

Average Daily Volume

1,722

Number of Holdings *

7

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
SMCO

Hilton Small-MidCap Opportunity ETF

SMCO Description The Sub-Adviser uses its proprietary Small & Mid Cap Opportunities investment process ("SMCO Process") to seek risk-adjusted returns by investing in U.S. equity securities within the small- and mid-cap asset classes. The fund"s portfolio will typically consist of between 50-75 stocks. The fund"s portfolio will consistently consist of stocks that the Sub-Adviser deems fundamentally attractive and reasonably valued. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund"s net assets, plus borrowings for investment purposes, will be invested in equity securities of small- and mid-capitalization companies.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$23.59

Average Daily Volume

2,153

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MUSQ SMCO
30 Days 0.89% -0.88%
60 Days -4.12% 1.97%
90 Days -2.76% 0.53%
12 Months
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MUSQ Weight in SMCO Overlap
LYV C 2.93% 2.03% 2.03%
Compare ETFs