MNA vs. IHF ETF Comparison

Comparison of IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) to iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF)
MNA

IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF

MNA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of its underlying index, the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. The fund employs a "passive management" to track the performance of the underlying index, which was developed by Financial Development Holdco LLC ("IndexIQ"). The underlying index seeks to employ a systematic investment process designed to identify opportunities in companies whose equity securities trade in developed markets, including the U.S., and which are involved in announced mergers, acquisitions and other buyout-related transactions. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$32.93

Average Daily Volume

62,649

Number of Holdings *

6

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
IHF

iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF

IHF Description The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$55.36

Average Daily Volume

64,968

Number of Holdings *

67

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MNA IHF
30 Days 0.70% -4.90%
60 Days 2.68% 0.93%
90 Days 3.67% 8.10%
12 Months 6.07% 12.95%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MNA Weight in IHF Overlap
MNA Overweight 6 Positions Relative to IHF
Symbol Grade Weight
COF A 7.41%
DFS A 6.86%
CTLT A 5.8%
JNPR C 5.07%
HCP A 4.34%
IP C 3.67%
MNA Underweight 67 Positions Relative to IHF
Symbol Grade Weight
UNH B -22.26%
ELV F -13.74%
CI D -8.08%
CVS D -4.94%
HCA C -4.68%
CNC F -4.58%
HUM F -4.39%
VEEV C -4.25%
MOH F -3.16%
LH D -2.94%
DGX D -2.72%
THC D -2.46%
UHS D -2.15%
EHC C -1.52%
CHE D -1.42%
ENSG D -1.29%
DVA C -1.19%
HQY B -1.1%
ACHC F -0.93%
DOCS A -0.85%
OPCH F -0.85%
RDNT C -0.71%
SEM D -0.58%
HIMS C -0.53%
AMED D -0.5%
EVH D -0.49%
CRVL C -0.46%
GH F -0.44%
ADUS D -0.37%
ASTH B -0.37%
SGRY C -0.37%
RCM B -0.35%
PINC F -0.33%
PRVA F -0.29%
NEO F -0.29%
AMN F -0.25%
NHC D -0.24%
TDOC D -0.23%
PACS C -0.23%
BKD F -0.21%
PGNY F -0.21%
PHR F -0.2%
USPH F -0.2%
CERT F -0.2%
AGL F -0.18%
CLOV B -0.18%
ALHC C -0.18%
SDGR F -0.16%
PNTG C -0.16%
MD B -0.15%
LFST C -0.14%
BTSG C -0.13%
CSTL B -0.12%
HSTM B -0.11%
CYH C -0.11%
GDRX F -0.09%
HCAT C -0.08%
SLP F -0.08%
OPK D -0.08%
CCRN F -0.07%
FLGT F -0.07%
SHCR A -0.07%
DCGO F -0.05%
NRC F -0.05%
DH F -0.04%
ACCD F -0.04%
MODV F -0.02%
Compare ETFs