MCSE vs. LGHT ETF Comparison

Comparison of Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) to Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT)

MCSE

Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF

MCSE Description

Martin Currie Sustainable International Equity ETF strives to provide long-term capital appreciation by investing in equity and equity-related securities of foreign companies. The fund focuses on finding companies that have a strong history of offering high and sustainable returns on invested capital over time.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$15.16

Average Daily Volume

1,084

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

LGHT

Langar Global HealthTech ETF

LGHT Description

LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$10.63

Average Daily Volume

374

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	MCSE	LGHT
30 Days	-0.95%	0.34%
60 Days	7.09%	6.26%
90 Days	1.36%	4.35%
12 Months	24.91%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in MCSE	Weight in LGHT	Overlap
	RMD	C	5.87%	5.43%	5.43%

MCSE Overweight 3 Positions Relative to LGHT

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LIN	B	5.14%
MTD	B	5.08%
NVO	F	4.56%

MCSE Underweight 7 Positions Relative to LGHT

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ISRG	C	-22.61%
GEHC	B	-6.69%
DXCM	F	-5.93%
IQV	F	-5.91%
PHG	A	-5.04%
VEEV	C	-4.53%
ZBH	F	-3.58%