LGHT vs. OCFS ETF Comparison
Comparison of Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) to Professionally Managed Portfolios Otter Creek Focus Strategy ETF (OCFS)
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
LGHT Description
LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$10.31
Average Daily Volume
913
31
OCFS
Professionally Managed Portfolios Otter Creek Focus Strategy ETF
OCFS Description
The fund is an actively-managed ETF that invests in U.S.-listed equity securities of small- and mid-capitalization companies. The fund invests primarily in publicly traded stocks of U.S. companies which the Advisor considers to have a small to mid-size market capitalization. The fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in U.S. dollar denominated foreign equity securities, including through American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") issued by U.S. depository banks, which are traded on U.S. exchanges.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.60
Average Daily Volume
1,237
20
Performance
Period | LGHT | OCFS |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -3.06% | -1.99% |
60 Days | -2.46% | 3.23% |
90 Days | -0.81% | 9.77% |
12 Months |
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in LGHT | Weight in OCFS | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEHC | C | 8.56% | 3.17% | 3.17% |
LGHT Overweight 30 Positions Relative to OCFS
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
ISRG | A | 15.39% | |
RMD | C | 6.71% | |
IQV | F | 6.34% | |
DXCM | C | 5.51% | |
PODD | B | 5.26% | |
VEEV | C | 5.15% | |
PHG | C | 4.87% | |
ZBH | C | 3.57% | |
BNTX | D | 3.53% | |
ALGN | D | 2.85% | |
MASI | B | 2.46% | |
DOCS | C | 2.06% | |
MRNA | F | 1.72% | |
PRCT | B | 1.27% | |
ALKS | C | 0.66% | |
TNDM | D | 0.54% | |
IRTC | C | 0.44% | |
PRVA | C | 0.44% | |
OMCL | C | 0.42% | |
LFST | C | 0.31% | |
TDOC | C | 0.28% | |
PGNY | F | 0.25% | |
EVH | F | 0.22% | |
SDGR | C | 0.21% | |
GDRX | F | 0.2% | |
ALHC | C | 0.2% | |
PHR | F | 0.17% | |
ACCD | F | 0.07% | |
MODV | C | 0.03% | |
TBRG | A | 0.03% |
LGHT Underweight 19 Positions Relative to OCFS
LGHT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
OCFS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords