LGHT vs. BSMC ETF Comparison

Comparison of Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) to Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC)
LGHT

Langar Global HealthTech ETF

LGHT Description

LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$10.42

Average Daily Volume

913

Number of Holdings *

31

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BSMC

Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF

BSMC Description The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to attain its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities of U.S. companies with small- and mid-market capitalizations (market value of publicly traded equity securities).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$31.87

Average Daily Volume

8,977

Number of Holdings *

64

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period LGHT BSMC
30 Days -0.59% 4.56%
60 Days -1.40% 2.90%
90 Days -1.14% 3.86%
12 Months 23.55%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in LGHT Weight in BSMC Overlap
PHG D 4.87% 1.09% 1.09%
ZBH C 3.57% 0.8% 0.8%
LGHT Overweight 29 Positions Relative to BSMC
Symbol Grade Weight
ISRG A 15.39%
GEHC F 8.56%
RMD C 6.71%
IQV D 6.34%
DXCM D 5.51%
PODD C 5.26%
VEEV C 5.15%
BNTX D 3.53%
ALGN D 2.85%
MASI A 2.46%
DOCS C 2.06%
MRNA F 1.72%
PRCT B 1.27%
ALKS B 0.66%
TNDM F 0.54%
IRTC D 0.44%
PRVA B 0.44%
OMCL C 0.42%
LFST C 0.31%
TDOC C 0.28%
PGNY F 0.25%
EVH F 0.22%
SDGR C 0.21%
GDRX F 0.2%
ALHC C 0.2%
PHR F 0.17%
ACCD D 0.07%
MODV C 0.03%
TBRG B 0.03%
LGHT Underweight 62 Positions Relative to BSMC
Symbol Grade Weight
NTGR B -3.1%
DOX D -2.93%
PINC B -2.78%
ERJ B -2.71%
EPC D -2.39%
TAP C -2.2%
DGX A -2.14%
CFG B -2.13%
IPGP D -2.05%
HCSG C -1.97%
MD B -1.92%
NPK B -1.9%
UNF B -1.88%
IFF D -1.79%
EQC B -1.76%
IPG D -1.74%
INGR B -1.69%
TXT D -1.68%
OMF A -1.67%
KMT B -1.64%
SEIC B -1.61%
FFIV B -1.58%
MOG.A B -1.57%
IMKTA C -1.53%
GRFS C -1.49%
PAHC C -1.49%
ELAN D -1.46%
UTHR C -1.33%
QRVO F -1.32%
SMG D -1.25%
XRAY F -1.2%
WTW B -1.18%
PBH A -1.15%
STT A -1.15%
ORI A -1.14%
WHR B -1.14%
SHC F -1.1%
KNX B -1.06%
FTRE D -1.05%
LEVI F -1.04%
OGN D -1.03%
WKC D -1.01%
SEB F -0.99%
SON D -0.98%
SXT B -0.98%
SCHL D -0.96%
WTM A -0.92%
ARLO C -0.92%
LANC C -0.89%
WMK C -0.89%
CPB D -0.88%
CNA B -0.86%
AVT C -0.86%
SEE C -0.85%
HSIC B -0.81%
SKX D -0.77%
ARW D -0.73%
KELYA F -0.61%
AGCO D -0.52%
TKR D -0.5%
LSTR D -0.4%
HTLD B -0.34%
Compare ETFs