JMID vs. XMHQ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ)

JMID

Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF

JMID Description

JMID is designed to capitalize on mid-cap growth opportunities within the US market. The portfolio is constructed using a proprietary quantitative model that integrates fundamental research. Security selection focuses on identifying stocks expected to outperform, based on an analysis of various combinations and weightings. The objective is to generate alpha, or returns above the benchmark index, by analyzing key growth factors. Additionally, it employs portfolio optimization techniques to maintain alignment with the benchmark's risk profile. The fund may engage in active and frequent trading.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.07

Average Daily Volume

2,689

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400Â® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400Â® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$105.30

Average Daily Volume

310,805

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	JMID	XMHQ
30 Days	10.70%	3.12%
60 Days	14.72%	3.51%
90 Days		3.55%
12 Months		28.09%

13 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in JMID	Weight in XMHQ	Overlap
CELH	F	0.28%	1.13%	0.28%
CROX	D	0.37%	1.02%	0.37%
CSL	C	1.6%	3.86%	1.6%
DT	D	0.98%	1.66%	0.98%
EME	A	2.37%	3.81%	2.37%
EXP	B	1.34%	1.45%	1.34%
FIX	A	1.81%	2.48%	1.81%
KNSL	B	0.54%	1.8%	0.54%
LOPE	C	0.41%	0.64%	0.41%
MANH	D	1.69%	4.08%	1.69%
MEDP	D	0.52%	1.62%	0.52%
PCTY	C	0.78%	1.22%	0.78%
WSM	C	0.81%	3.43%	0.81%

JMID Overweight 65 Positions Relative to XMHQ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PLTR	B	3.96%
APP	B	3.36%
AMP	A	3.08%
GWW	B	2.97%
COR	B	2.74%
IT	C	2.72%
CPAY	A	2.55%
ALL	A	2.4%
GDDY	A	2.35%
NU	C	2.16%
FAST	B	2.15%
VRT	B	2.12%
NTAP	C	2.08%
ARES	A	2.06%
EXPE	B	1.98%
SPG	A	1.86%
COIN	C	1.84%
CLX	A	1.73%
BR	A	1.7%
POOL	C	1.66%
VEEV	C	1.59%
VRSK	A	1.49%
LNG	A	1.46%
DECK	A	1.35%
TPL	A	1.34%
NRG	B	1.29%
DOCU	B	1.26%
JBL	C	1.2%
LAMR	C	1.2%
DVA	C	1.17%
LPX	B	1.03%
ALNY	D	1.02%
DXCM	C	1.01%
WAT	C	1.01%
BLDR	D	1.01%
ZBRA	B	0.99%
UI	B	0.95%
TPX	B	0.91%
PODD	C	0.89%
RBLX	C	0.89%
PEGA	B	0.88%
EXEL	B	0.87%
VLTO	C	0.87%
SYY	D	0.76%
RMD	C	0.75%
TDC	D	0.74%
HRB	D	0.74%
NTNX	B	0.73%
MDB	B	0.71%
BSY	F	0.66%
GNRC	C	0.63%
NXST	C	0.52%
HWM	A	0.52%
PAYC	B	0.48%
CACC	D	0.48%
PPC	C	0.48%
XP	F	0.47%
DOCS	C	0.44%
APPF	B	0.43%
TTEK	F	0.4%
CVNA	B	0.38%
RNG	C	0.38%
ENPH	F	0.32%
FTRE	D	0.24%
TKO	A	0.18%

JMID Underweight 63 Positions Relative to XMHQ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
THC	D	-2.39%
RS	B	-2.38%
RNR	C	-2.28%
OC	A	-2.16%
LECO	C	-2.08%
GGG	B	-2.05%
TOL	B	-2.03%
PSTG	D	-1.86%
CW	C	-1.83%
BLD	D	-1.59%
DKS	D	-1.57%
CR	A	-1.44%
MUSA	B	-1.43%
AYI	B	-1.43%
AIT	B	-1.4%
CVLT	B	-1.38%
PRI	B	-1.35%
WMS	F	-1.34%
INGR	C	-1.32%
AFG	A	-1.3%
RGLD	C	-1.3%
CHE	D	-1.3%
TREX	C	-1.3%
SEIC	B	-1.28%
UFPI	C	-1.21%
CNM	D	-1.2%
LSTR	D	-1.13%
DCI	B	-1.12%
RLI	A	-1.1%
LSCC	D	-1.09%
SAIC	F	-1.03%
SSD	F	-1.01%
WFRD	D	-0.96%
QLYS	B	-0.94%
LNTH	D	-0.94%
G	B	-0.94%
ELF	C	-0.93%
VNT	C	-0.91%
COKE	C	-0.9%
ROIV	C	-0.9%
CHX	C	-0.88%
DINO	D	-0.87%
KBH	D	-0.85%
MSA	F	-0.84%
CBT	D	-0.82%
MTG	C	-0.81%
VVV	D	-0.8%
ESNT	F	-0.74%
EXPO	D	-0.74%
CRUS	D	-0.66%
MSM	C	-0.66%
NEU	D	-0.6%
LANC	C	-0.52%
FHI	B	-0.51%
IBOC	B	-0.49%
ENS	F	-0.49%
TEX	F	-0.48%
SAM	C	-0.48%
YETI	D	-0.48%
NSP	F	-0.47%
VC	F	-0.39%
CXT	C	-0.35%
CRI	F	-0.32%