JMID vs. LCLG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) to Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG)
JMID

Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF

JMID Description

JMID is designed to capitalize on mid-cap growth opportunities within the US market. The portfolio is constructed using a proprietary quantitative model that integrates fundamental research. Security selection focuses on identifying stocks expected to outperform, based on an analysis of various combinations and weightings. The objective is to generate alpha, or returns above the benchmark index, by analyzing key growth factors. Additionally, it employs portfolio optimization techniques to maintain alignment with the benchmark's risk profile. The fund may engage in active and frequent trading.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.41

Average Daily Volume

2,705

Number of Holdings *

78

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
LCLG

Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF

LCLG Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests primarily in securities of companies that use innovative technologies or ideas to gain advantage over competitors. The Advisor expects to invest principally in large capitalization equity securities that are traded on U.S. securities exchanges. The fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities of foreign issuers, including issuers in emerging markets.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.41

Average Daily Volume

584

Number of Holdings *

57

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period JMID LCLG
30 Days 8.10% 6.23%
60 Days 10.99%
90 Days 11.56%
12 Months 42.09%
9 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in JMID Weight in LCLG Overlap
APP B 2.93% 4.28% 2.93%
COIN B 1.7% 1.46% 1.46%
DECK B 1.33% 1.78% 1.33%
FAST B 2.2% 2.31% 2.2%
PAYC B 0.49% 0.85% 0.49%
POOL D 1.73% 0.46% 0.46%
WAT B 1.05% 1.36% 1.05%
WSM F 0.83% 1.65% 0.83%
ZBRA B 0.99% 1.21% 0.99%
JMID Overweight 69 Positions Relative to LCLG
Symbol Grade Weight
PLTR B 3.77%
AMP A 3.03%
GWW B 3.02%
COR B 2.81%
IT B 2.77%
CPAY A 2.41%
EME B 2.41%
ALL B 2.36%
GDDY B 2.28%
NU B 2.19%
NTAP D 2.18%
VRT B 2.16%
ARES B 2.07%
EXPE B 1.92%
SPG A 1.85%
FIX B 1.85%
MANH C 1.73%
CLX A 1.72%
BR A 1.67%
CSL B 1.61%
VEEV B 1.56%
VRSK A 1.48%
LNG B 1.41%
EXP B 1.38%
NRG C 1.37%
TPL B 1.33%
JBL C 1.29%
LAMR D 1.29%
DOCU B 1.21%
DVA C 1.15%
ALNY D 1.09%
BLDR C 1.01%
DT C 1.0%
LPX A 1.0%
DXCM C 0.94%
TPX B 0.91%
EXEL B 0.9%
RBLX B 0.9%
VLTO D 0.89%
PEGA B 0.86%
PODD B 0.85%
RMD C 0.82%
HRB D 0.81%
PCTY B 0.8%
SYY D 0.78%
TDC F 0.74%
UI B 0.73%
NTNX B 0.73%
MDB C 0.73%
BSY F 0.7%
GNRC B 0.64%
NXST C 0.6%
MEDP D 0.56%
KNSL C 0.52%
PPC C 0.51%
HWM B 0.51%
XP F 0.5%
CACC D 0.49%
TTEK F 0.47%
APPF B 0.44%
RNG C 0.41%
LOPE B 0.41%
CVNA B 0.39%
CROX F 0.38%
DOCS B 0.37%
ENPH F 0.36%
CELH F 0.31%
FTRE D 0.22%
TKO D 0.18%
JMID Underweight 48 Positions Relative to LCLG
Symbol Grade Weight
NFLX A -4.87%
AAPL C -4.59%
MA B -4.49%
APH B -4.4%
AMZN A -4.37%
AVGO C -4.35%
META B -4.04%
KLAC F -3.99%
DKS D -2.98%
CTAS B -2.83%
GOOGL C -2.63%
URI B -2.6%
ODFL B -2.19%
TTD B -1.96%
ANET C -1.9%
GOOG C -1.85%
MTD F -1.85%
LAD B -1.71%
BURL C -1.67%
SHW A -1.57%
CPRT A -1.56%
TXRH A -1.5%
LECO C -1.5%
EA A -1.28%
SBUX B -1.22%
ADBE C -1.07%
ACN B -1.07%
NDSN B -0.96%
MAR A -0.96%
GPK D -0.91%
MNST B -0.9%
A F -0.89%
HD B -0.89%
LPLA A -0.83%
HUBB C -0.83%
IQV F -0.76%
LOGI F -0.7%
LULU B -0.64%
TRMB B -0.58%
ZTS D -0.58%
ELF C -0.53%
ETN B -0.52%
CRL C -0.45%
NSP F -0.43%
LW B -0.4%
RH C -0.38%
OMF A -0.34%
IPGP C -0.29%
Compare ETFs