JMID vs. IQM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) to Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM)
JMID

Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF

JMID Description

JMID is designed to capitalize on mid-cap growth opportunities within the US market. The portfolio is constructed using a proprietary quantitative model that integrates fundamental research. Security selection focuses on identifying stocks expected to outperform, based on an analysis of various combinations and weightings. The objective is to generate alpha, or returns above the benchmark index, by analyzing key growth factors. Additionally, it employs portfolio optimization techniques to maintain alignment with the benchmark's risk profile. The fund may engage in active and frequent trading.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.41

Average Daily Volume

2,705

Number of Holdings *

78

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
IQM

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

IQM Description The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies that are relevant to its investment theme of intelligent machines. The fund invests predominantly in common stock. Although it may invest across economic sectors, the advisor expects to have significant positions in particular sectors including technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$66.64

Average Daily Volume

3,612

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period JMID IQM
30 Days 8.10% 6.04%
60 Days 9.34%
90 Days 7.36%
12 Months 41.48%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in JMID Weight in IQM Overlap
BSY F 0.7% 0.39% 0.39%
PLTR B 3.77% 0.33% 0.33%
VRT B 2.16% 1.1% 1.1%
ZBRA B 0.99% 1.02% 0.99%
JMID Overweight 74 Positions Relative to IQM
Symbol Grade Weight
AMP A 3.03%
GWW B 3.02%
APP B 2.93%
COR B 2.81%
IT B 2.77%
CPAY A 2.41%
EME B 2.41%
ALL B 2.36%
GDDY B 2.28%
FAST B 2.2%
NU B 2.19%
NTAP D 2.18%
ARES B 2.07%
EXPE B 1.92%
SPG A 1.85%
FIX B 1.85%
MANH C 1.73%
POOL D 1.73%
CLX A 1.72%
COIN B 1.7%
BR A 1.67%
CSL B 1.61%
VEEV B 1.56%
VRSK A 1.48%
LNG B 1.41%
EXP B 1.38%
NRG C 1.37%
DECK B 1.33%
TPL B 1.33%
JBL C 1.29%
LAMR D 1.29%
DOCU B 1.21%
DVA C 1.15%
ALNY D 1.09%
WAT B 1.05%
BLDR C 1.01%
DT C 1.0%
LPX A 1.0%
DXCM C 0.94%
TPX B 0.91%
EXEL B 0.9%
RBLX B 0.9%
VLTO D 0.89%
PEGA B 0.86%
PODD B 0.85%
WSM F 0.83%
RMD C 0.82%
HRB D 0.81%
PCTY B 0.8%
SYY D 0.78%
TDC F 0.74%
UI B 0.73%
NTNX B 0.73%
MDB C 0.73%
GNRC B 0.64%
NXST C 0.6%
MEDP D 0.56%
KNSL C 0.52%
PPC C 0.51%
HWM B 0.51%
XP F 0.5%
CACC D 0.49%
PAYC B 0.49%
TTEK F 0.47%
APPF B 0.44%
RNG C 0.41%
LOPE B 0.41%
CVNA B 0.39%
CROX F 0.38%
DOCS B 0.37%
ENPH F 0.36%
CELH F 0.31%
FTRE D 0.22%
TKO D 0.18%
JMID Underweight 45 Positions Relative to IQM
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA A -13.78%
ISRG A -5.7%
AXON B -5.49%
TSLA B -4.19%
AAPL C -4.09%
TSM C -4.05%
CDNS B -3.99%
SNPS C -3.87%
ASML D -2.85%
PWR B -2.63%
AMAT F -2.49%
AVGO C -2.12%
AMD F -2.09%
ADSK B -1.94%
TER F -1.45%
ADI D -1.36%
APH B -1.33%
UBER F -1.33%
PTC B -1.31%
KLAC F -1.31%
VMI B -1.2%
ALTR C -1.2%
LRCX F -1.19%
GEV B -1.16%
ETN B -1.04%
AVAV C -1.0%
CRWD B -0.85%
ROP A -0.84%
KEYS C -0.8%
PRCT C -0.71%
IDXX F -0.71%
TXN B -0.7%
ENTG F -0.65%
BKR B -0.55%
IOT B -0.53%
TRMB B -0.48%
NXPI F -0.45%
FSLR F -0.36%
PSTG D -0.35%
SITM B -0.31%
MCHP F -0.3%
FTI B -0.26%
OII B -0.26%
ALGN D -0.22%
MPWR F -0.19%
Compare ETFs