IPAY vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)

IPAY

ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF

IPAY Description

The ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY®) seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Prime Mobile Payments Index. The index provides a benchmark for investors interested in tracking the mobile and electronic payments industry, speciﬁcally focusing on credit card networks, payment infrastructure and software services, payment processing services, and payment solutions (such as smartcards, prepaid cards, virtual wallets).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$47.53

Average Daily Volume

21,065

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$96.67

Average Daily Volume

7,603

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IPAY	CZA
30 Days	-1.31%	-2.10%
60 Days	-3.12%	-2.13%
90 Days	-6.51%	-3.52%
12 Months	13.11%	10.71%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in IPAY	Weight in CZA	Overlap
	CPAY	D	4.58%	1.48%	1.48%
	WEX	D	3.64%	0.57%	0.57%

IPAY Overweight 24 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
MA	C	6.1%
V	C	6.03%
AXP	C	5.96%
PYPL	D	5.74%
COIN	C	5.13%
DFS	B	4.69%
FIS	B	4.53%
TOST	B	4.53%
SQ	C	4.17%
GPN	D	4.13%
AFRM	F	3.05%
FOUR	B	2.46%
EEFT	D	2.43%
ACIW	A	1.85%
WU	D	1.66%
STNE	D	1.63%
QTWO	B	1.54%
MQ	C	1.06%
PAGS	C	0.95%
EVTC	F	0.93%
DLO	F	0.33%
IMXI	F	0.31%
GDOT	F	0.3%
QIWI	D	0.0%

IPAY Underweight 95 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GLW	B	-2.61%
HIG	C	-2.38%
WAB	D	-2.18%
WTW	B	-2.13%
EQR	B	-2.1%
DOV	D	-1.98%
VLTO	D	-1.84%
DTE	D	-1.82%
ETR	D	-1.78%
ZBH	D	-1.72%
STT	C	-1.67%
ES	C	-1.62%
WRB	C	-1.6%
BAH	C	-1.59%
LDOS	B	-1.57%
CHKP	A	-1.56%
HUBB	C	-1.5%
CSL	C	-1.49%
LII	B	-1.48%
APTV	F	-1.46%
MKC	C	-1.46%
CINF	C	-1.44%
TDY	D	-1.43%
AVY	D	-1.42%
J	D	-1.38%
BAX	C	-1.35%
EG	D	-1.31%
JBHT	F	-1.3%
WMG	D	-1.29%
LOGI	C	-1.26%
SUI	C	-1.23%
IEX	D	-1.19%
AMCR	D	-1.14%
UDR	B	-1.07%
RPM	D	-1.07%
TRMB	C	-1.06%
GGG	D	-1.05%
CAG	D	-1.03%
BAP	C	-1.01%
NI	B	-1.0%
RNR	D	-0.96%
GLPI	B	-0.96%
CNA	B	-0.96%
NVT	D	-0.94%
AOS	D	-0.94%
FLEX	D	-0.92%
ACM	D	-0.91%
REG	B	-0.9%
SKX	C	-0.86%
EMN	D	-0.84%
PFGC	D	-0.84%
WWD	D	-0.83%
SNX	D	-0.8%
XP	F	-0.8%
ITT	D	-0.78%
REXR	C	-0.77%
MOS	F	-0.77%
HII	D	-0.77%
QGEN	D	-0.76%
CACI	B	-0.76%
DOX	D	-0.75%
UNM	D	-0.75%
ATR	D	-0.74%
AIZ	D	-0.69%
RRX	F	-0.69%
ALV	D	-0.68%
SEIC	D	-0.65%
CR	C	-0.63%
GNTX	D	-0.61%
INGR	D	-0.58%
KEX	B	-0.53%
CRUS	A	-0.53%
IVZ	D	-0.51%
ESI	B	-0.5%
LFUS	C	-0.5%
ALSN	D	-0.49%
RHP	D	-0.47%
G	D	-0.47%
AXS	C	-0.47%
VNT	D	-0.45%
ESNT	C	-0.45%
RRR	B	-0.44%
ESAB	D	-0.42%
JHG	B	-0.42%
AMG	D	-0.4%
SON	F	-0.4%
ZWS	D	-0.39%
MDU	C	-0.39%
BLCO	F	-0.39%
UGI	D	-0.38%
ACT	C	-0.37%
FLO	D	-0.36%
FELE	D	-0.34%
FUL	D	-0.33%
CPA	D	-0.3%