IHF vs. PCIG ETF Comparison
Comparison of iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF) to Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG)
IHF
iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF
IHF Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$53.30
Average Daily Volume
61,573
66
PCIG
Polen Capital International Growth ETF
PCIG Description
PCIG aims to deliver sustainable, above-average earnings growth and long-term stock price appreciation within the global ex-US equity market. The strategy is rooted in fundamental research, selecting 25-35 large-cap growth companies with a sustainable edge like consistent earnings growth, robust balance sheets, and shareholder-oriented management teams. Such companies are selected within industries characterized by high barriers to entry, such as those requiring substantial capital investment, government approvals, or significant intellectual property. Moreover, it integrates ESG factors into the investment process. While the fund may concentrate investments in the consumer discretionary and financial sectors, it avoids over-concentration in any one industry. Investments are typically held for the long term but are subject to period review and potential sale based on changing market conditions, company performance, or perceived threats to competitive advantage.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$9.52
Average Daily Volume
5,603
10
Performance
| Period | IHF | PCIG |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 0.87% | -1.19% |
| 60 Days | -6.57% | -3.79% |
| 90 Days | -7.42% | -4.23% |
| 12 Months | 4.75% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in IHF | Weight in PCIG | Overlap |
|---|
IHF Overweight 66 Positions Relative to PCIG
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | C | 24.61% | |
| ELV | F | 11.41% | |
| CI | F | 8.11% | |
| VEEV | C | 4.67% | |
| CVS | D | 4.65% | |
| HCA | F | 4.32% | |
| HUM | C | 4.12% | |
| CNC | D | 3.83% | |
| LH | C | 3.38% | |
| DGX | A | 3.06% | |
| MOH | F | 2.95% | |
| THC | D | 2.55% | |
| UHS | D | 2.05% | |
| EHC | B | 1.7% | |
| HQY | B | 1.47% | |
| CHE | D | 1.44% | |
| ENSG | D | 1.39% | |
| DVA | B | 1.27% | |
| DOCS | C | 1.06% | |
| RDNT | B | 0.89% | |
| SEM | B | 0.67% | |
| OPCH | D | 0.64% | |
| HIMS | B | 0.63% | |
| GH | B | 0.61% | |
| ACHC | F | 0.6% | |
| CRVL | A | 0.54% | |
| AMED | F | 0.5% | |
| PINC | B | 0.4% | |
| RCM | F | 0.38% | |
| ADUS | D | 0.37% | |
| PRVA | B | 0.37% | |
| NEO | C | 0.33% | |
| ASTH | D | 0.29% | |
| SGRY | F | 0.29% | |
| NHC | C | 0.27% | |
| TDOC | C | 0.27% | |
| EVH | F | 0.23% | |
| USPH | B | 0.23% | |
| CLOV | D | 0.21% | |
| ALHC | C | 0.2% | |
| MD | B | 0.2% | |
| PGNY | F | 0.19% | |
| CERT | F | 0.19% | |
| SDGR | C | 0.18% | |
| BKD | D | 0.18% | |
| BTSG | C | 0.18% | |
| PHR | F | 0.17% | |
| LFST | C | 0.16% | |
| PNTG | D | 0.16% | |
| AMN | F | 0.15% | |
| HSTM | B | 0.13% | |
| CSTL | D | 0.13% | |
| PACS | F | 0.11% | |
| OPK | C | 0.1% | |
| CYH | F | 0.08% | |
| HCAT | D | 0.08% | |
| SLP | D | 0.08% | |
| AGL | F | 0.08% | |
| FLGT | F | 0.06% | |
| GDRX | F | 0.06% | |
| DCGO | C | 0.06% | |
| NRC | F | 0.05% | |
| CCRN | F | 0.05% | |
| DH | D | 0.04% | |
| ACCD | D | 0.04% | |
| MODV | C | 0.03% |
IHF: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PCIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
