IHF vs. MRGR ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF) to ProShares Merger ETF (MRGR)

IHF

iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF

IHF Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$55.83

Average Daily Volume

66,591

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

MRGR

ProShares Merger ETF

MRGR Description

The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the S&P Merger Arbitrage Index (the "index"). The fund is designed to track the performance of the index and provide exposure to a global merger arbitrage strategy. The index, and by extension the fund, seeks to produce consistent, positive returns in virtually all market environments, although there are no assurances it will achieve this result. The fund is non-diversified. The index seeks to provide a risk arbitrage strategy that exploits commonly observed price changes associated with a global selection of publicly announced mergers, acquisitions and other corporate reorganizations. Historically, the index has exhibited market neutral characteristics, lower volatility compared to the S&P 500, and a low correlation to S&P 500 returns.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.93

Average Daily Volume

710

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IHF	MRGR
30 Days	-4.16%	1.06%
60 Days	-0.76%	2.48%
90 Days	8.47%	4.17%
12 Months	14.95%	7.63%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in IHF	Weight in MRGR	Overlap
	RCM	B	0.35%	2.32%	0.35%

IHF Overweight 66 Positions Relative to MRGR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UNH	B	22.26%
ELV	F	13.74%
CI	D	8.08%
CVS	D	4.94%
HCA	B	4.68%
CNC	F	4.58%
HUM	F	4.39%
VEEV	C	4.25%
MOH	D	3.16%
LH	D	2.94%
DGX	B	2.72%
THC	C	2.46%
UHS	D	2.15%
EHC	B	1.52%
CHE	C	1.42%
ENSG	D	1.29%
DVA	C	1.19%
HQY	C	1.1%
ACHC	F	0.93%
DOCS	A	0.85%
OPCH	F	0.85%
RDNT	C	0.71%
SEM	D	0.58%
HIMS	B	0.53%
AMED	D	0.5%
EVH	D	0.49%
CRVL	C	0.46%
GH	F	0.44%
ADUS	D	0.37%
ASTH	A	0.37%
SGRY	C	0.37%
PINC	F	0.33%
PRVA	F	0.29%
NEO	F	0.29%
AMN	F	0.25%
NHC	D	0.24%
TDOC	D	0.23%
PACS	C	0.23%
BKD	D	0.21%
PGNY	F	0.21%
PHR	F	0.2%
USPH	F	0.2%
CERT	F	0.2%
AGL	F	0.18%
CLOV	B	0.18%
ALHC	B	0.18%
SDGR	F	0.16%
PNTG	C	0.16%
MD	B	0.15%
LFST	B	0.14%
BTSG	C	0.13%
CSTL	C	0.12%
HSTM	B	0.11%
CYH	C	0.11%
GDRX	F	0.09%
HCAT	C	0.08%
SLP	F	0.08%
OPK	D	0.08%
CCRN	F	0.07%
FLGT	F	0.07%
SHCR	A	0.07%
DCGO	F	0.05%
NRC	F	0.05%
DH	F	0.04%
ACCD	F	0.04%
MODV	F	0.02%

IHF Underweight 27 Positions Relative to MRGR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HTLF	C	-3.12%
IBTX	D	-2.79%
INFN	C	-2.53%
DFS	C	-2.52%
EDR	A	-2.41%
SQSP	A	-2.4%
K	B	-2.35%
SRCL	B	-2.35%
EVRI	A	-2.35%
PETQ	A	-2.34%
INST	B	-2.33%
ENV	C	-2.33%
JNPR	B	-2.32%
VGR	B	-2.32%
PRFT	A	-2.31%
HCP	B	-2.3%
ALE	A	-2.28%
TELL	B	-2.27%
AXNX	A	-2.23%
SPR	D	-2.23%
CTLT	A	-2.22%
ANSS	D	-2.2%
MRO	D	-2.17%
RVNC	F	-1.9%
MGRC	D	-1.88%
HES	D	-1.83%
CHX	D	-1.8%