IHF vs. ITEQ ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF (IHF) to BlueStar TA-BIGITech Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ)

IHF

iShares U.S. Health Care Providers ETF

IHF Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the healthcare providers sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the healthcare providers sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$53.42

Average Daily Volume

61,864

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ITEQ

BlueStar TA-BIGITech Israel Technology ETF

ITEQ Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the total return performance of the TASE-BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index™ ("TA-BIGITech™"). The fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in the component securities of the index and in depositary receipts representing such securities. As a result, normally the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in Israeli technology companies. TA-BIGITech™ was created in 2013 by BlueStar Global Investors LLC d/b/a BlueStar Indexes® and the ISE and tracks the performance of exchange-listed Israeli technology operating companies. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$51.65

Average Daily Volume

8,295

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IHF	ITEQ
30 Days	0.32%	5.77%
60 Days	-6.54%	10.06%
90 Days	-7.21%	8.27%
12 Months	4.98%	23.39%

0 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in IHF	Weight in ITEQ	Overlap

IHF Overweight 66 Positions Relative to ITEQ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
UNH	B	24.61%
ELV	F	11.41%
CI	D	8.11%
VEEV	C	4.67%
CVS	D	4.65%
HCA	F	4.32%
HUM	C	4.12%
CNC	D	3.83%
LH	B	3.38%
DGX	A	3.06%
MOH	F	2.95%
THC	D	2.55%
UHS	D	2.05%
EHC	B	1.7%
HQY	A	1.47%
CHE	D	1.44%
ENSG	C	1.39%
DVA	C	1.27%
DOCS	C	1.06%
RDNT	B	0.89%
SEM	B	0.67%
OPCH	D	0.64%
HIMS	B	0.63%
GH	B	0.61%
ACHC	F	0.6%
CRVL	B	0.54%
AMED	F	0.5%
PINC	B	0.4%
RCM	A	0.38%
ADUS	D	0.37%
PRVA	C	0.37%
NEO	C	0.33%
ASTH	F	0.29%
SGRY	F	0.29%
NHC	C	0.27%
TDOC	C	0.27%
EVH	F	0.23%
USPH	B	0.23%
CLOV	D	0.21%
ALHC	C	0.2%
MD	C	0.2%
PGNY	F	0.19%
CERT	F	0.19%
SDGR	C	0.18%
BKD	F	0.18%
BTSG	C	0.18%
PHR	F	0.17%
LFST	B	0.16%
PNTG	D	0.16%
AMN	F	0.15%
HSTM	B	0.13%
CSTL	D	0.13%
PACS	F	0.11%
OPK	C	0.1%
CYH	F	0.08%
HCAT	D	0.08%
SLP	D	0.08%
AGL	F	0.08%
FLGT	F	0.06%
GDRX	F	0.06%
DCGO	B	0.06%
NRC	F	0.05%
CCRN	F	0.05%
DH	F	0.04%
ACCD	D	0.04%
MODV	C	0.03%

IHF Underweight 30 Positions Relative to ITEQ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CYBR	A	-8.37%
MNDY	C	-7.9%
CHKP	C	-7.83%
NICE	D	-7.29%
DOX	D	-6.95%
WIX	A	-6.89%
S	B	-5.06%
GLBE	B	-3.17%
FROG	C	-2.73%
ORA	B	-2.7%
PAYO	A	-2.2%
LMND	B	-1.58%
INMD	C	-1.47%
CLBT	B	-1.34%
KRNT	B	-1.28%
FVRR	B	-1.09%
NVCR	C	-1.01%
SPNS	F	-0.93%
RDWR	B	-0.68%
SSYS	B	-0.59%
PLTK	B	-0.56%
CEVA	B	-0.55%
SEDG	F	-0.54%
RSKD	D	-0.51%
NNDM	D	-0.51%
URGN	F	-0.49%
CGNT	B	-0.46%
NNOX	C	-0.42%
MGIC	D	-0.37%
VPG	F	-0.27%