ICLN vs. JHMU ETF Comparison
Comparison of iShares S&P Global Clean Energy Index Fund (ICLN) to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU)
ICLN
iShares S&P Global Clean Energy Index Fund
ICLN Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of global equities in the clean energy sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the S&P Global Clean Energy IndexTM (the "underlying index"), which is designed to track the performance of approximately 30 of what is expected to be the most liquid and tradable securities of global companies involved in clean energy related businesses. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$13.15
Average Daily Volume
2,247,656
3
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
JHMU Description
The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities that compose the fund's index. The index is designed to comprise securities in the utilities sector within the U.S. Universe whose market capitalizations are larger than that of the 1001st largest U.S. company at the time of reconstitution. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.40
Average Daily Volume
2,260
10
Performance
| Period | ICLN | JHMU |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -8.49% | -1.50% |
| 60 Days | -7.98% | -0.13% |
| 90 Days | -5.67% | -0.39% |
| 12 Months | 0.16% | 10.94% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in ICLN | Weight in JHMU | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ED | C | 6.52% | 4.12% | 4.12% |
ICLN: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
JHMU: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
