HRTS vs. PCIG ETF Comparison
Comparison of Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF (HRTS) to Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG)
HRTS
Tema Cardiovascular and Metabolic ETF
HRTS Description
Under normal circumstances, the fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, which include borrowings for investment purposes, in publicly listed companies that derive at least 50% of revenues from products or services related to the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and/or metabolic diseases, as defined by the Centers for Diseases Control and Preventions. The fund advisor generally is expected to consist of more than 15 companies but not more than 100 companies. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.96
Average Daily Volume
15,105
36
PCIG
Polen Capital International Growth ETF
PCIG Description
PCIG aims to deliver sustainable, above-average earnings growth and long-term stock price appreciation within the global ex-US equity market. The strategy is rooted in fundamental research, selecting 25-35 large-cap growth companies with a sustainable edge like consistent earnings growth, robust balance sheets, and shareholder-oriented management teams. Such companies are selected within industries characterized by high barriers to entry, such as those requiring substantial capital investment, government approvals, or significant intellectual property. Moreover, it integrates ESG factors into the investment process. While the fund may concentrate investments in the consumer discretionary and financial sectors, it avoids over-concentration in any one industry. Investments are typically held for the long term but are subject to period review and potential sale based on changing market conditions, company performance, or perceived threats to competitive advantage.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$9.45
Average Daily Volume
5,905
10
Performance
| Period | HRTS | PCIG |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -9.26% | -4.03% |
| 60 Days | -10.96% | -4.91% |
| 90 Days | -11.11% | -4.78% |
| 12 Months | 15.98% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in HRTS | Weight in PCIG | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDT | D | 2.79% | 5.31% | 2.79% |
HRTS Overweight 35 Positions Relative to PCIG
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LLY | F | 6.44% | |
| VRTX | D | 5.64% | |
| AMGN | D | 5.11% | |
| ALNY | D | 4.95% | |
| CRNX | B | 4.0% | |
| BBIO | F | 3.69% | |
| CYTK | D | 3.47% | |
| BSX | A | 2.99% | |
| ASND | F | 2.88% | |
| MIRM | B | 2.6% | |
| DXCM | C | 2.57% | |
| MREO | F | 2.49% | |
| IONS | F | 2.42% | |
| MASI | B | 2.39% | |
| REGN | F | 2.37% | |
| KROS | D | 2.1% | |
| EW | C | 1.91% | |
| MLYS | F | 1.89% | |
| PODD | B | 1.88% | |
| RCKT | F | 1.8% | |
| ARWR | D | 1.76% | |
| RARE | F | 1.71% | |
| NTLA | F | 1.66% | |
| MDGL | C | 1.46% | |
| WST | C | 1.43% | |
| AKRO | C | 1.28% | |
| NVS | D | 1.26% | |
| VKTX | F | 1.14% | |
| NARI | C | 0.97% | |
| EWTX | C | 0.96% | |
| SLN | F | 0.91% | |
| TERN | F | 0.7% | |
| VERV | D | 0.64% | |
| TNYA | C | 0.43% | |
| RANI | F | 0.31% |
HRTS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PCIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
