HART vs. QLTY ETF Comparison
Comparison of IQ Healthy Hearts ETF (HART) to GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY)
HART
IQ Healthy Hearts ETF
HART Description
The investment seeks investment results that correspond (before fees and expenses) generally to the price and yield performance of its underlying index, the IQ Candriam Healthy Hearts Index. The fund employs a passive management - or indexing - investment approach designed to track the performance of the index, which was developed by IndexIQ LLC with Candriam Belgium S.A. acting as index consultant to IndexIQ. The index includes securities of large-, mid- and small-capitalization companies that trade in the U.S. and foreign markets, including emerging markets other than China, Egypt, India, Kuwait, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$31.16
Average Daily Volume
831
47
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
QLTY Description
QLTY seeks total return by investing in US companies deemed high quality. These companies are defined as having established businesses capable of delivering substantial returns on past investments, utilizing cash flows for high-return investments, or returning cash to shareholders through dividends or share buybacks. The investment strategy combines systematic factors like profitability and leverage, alongside judgmental factors such as assessments of future profitability and growth prospects. It may also use various valuation methodologies, including discounted cash flow analysis and multiples of price-to-earnings, revenues, book values, or other fundamental metrics, to acquire underrated stocks. Additionally, the fund may invest in other ETFs. The fund may also invest in the GMO U.S. Treasury Fund, and money market funds. Investment decisions are not constrained by portfolio turnover rates or benchmark considerations.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.45
Average Daily Volume
265,587
34
Performance
| Period | HART | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -3.79% | 0.40% |
| 60 Days | -5.77% | 0.12% |
| 90 Days | -6.07% | 2.04% |
| 12 Months | 13.18% | 26.17% |
HART Overweight 40 Positions Relative to QLTY
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFE | F | 4.79% | |
| NVS | F | 4.63% | |
| BSX | A | 3.33% | |
| BMY | B | 3.08% | |
| MDT | D | 2.86% | |
| NKE | F | 2.33% | |
| HCA | F | 1.67% | |
| EW | C | 1.02% | |
| GIS | D | 0.94% | |
| PTON | A | 0.91% | |
| GRMN | B | 0.85% | |
| CNC | D | 0.79% | |
| ATRC | C | 0.72% | |
| DECK | A | 0.69% | |
| UAA | C | 0.68% | |
| RYTM | C | 0.67% | |
| IRTC | C | 0.63% | |
| PLNT | A | 0.63% | |
| PNR | A | 0.63% | |
| PEN | B | 0.62% | |
| NARI | C | 0.61% | |
| K | A | 0.6% | |
| ONON | A | 0.6% | |
| VFC | C | 0.59% | |
| EHC | B | 0.58% | |
| UTHR | C | 0.57% | |
| MMSI | A | 0.56% | |
| COLM | C | 0.56% | |
| HAYW | B | 0.56% | |
| SEM | B | 0.55% | |
| LIVN | F | 0.55% | |
| POOL | C | 0.54% | |
| MTN | C | 0.52% | |
| THC | D | 0.52% | |
| BEAM | D | 0.52% | |
| CYTK | F | 0.51% | |
| MOH | F | 0.47% | |
| DKS | D | 0.45% | |
| MODG | F | 0.44% | |
| ACHC | F | 0.26% |
HART Underweight 27 Positions Relative to QLTY
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | D | -6.46% | |
| ORCL | A | -4.71% | |
| META | D | -4.5% | |
| TXN | C | -3.53% | |
| ACN | B | -3.3% | |
| V | A | -3.22% | |
| PG | C | -3.2% | |
| ISRG | A | -2.92% | |
| KLAC | F | -2.85% | |
| LRCX | F | -2.85% | |
| CRM | B | -2.84% | |
| KO | D | -2.81% | |
| HLT | A | -2.62% | |
| ARMK | B | -2.56% | |
| WFC | A | -2.45% | |
| AVGO | D | -2.45% | |
| MRK | D | -2.41% | |
| AMZN | C | -2.4% | |
| USB | A | -2.31% | |
| OTIS | C | -2.25% | |
| TJX | A | -2.14% | |
| GE | D | -1.73% | |
| MDLZ | F | -1.72% | |
| STZ | D | -1.59% | |
| CI | D | -1.49% | |
| DGX | A | -1.35% | |
| TMO | F | -0.91% |
HART: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
QLTY: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
