GSIB vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)
GSIB

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF

GSIB Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that will invest in the equity securities of companies that operate in the global banking sector. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in securities that are part of the global banking sector and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") that represent such companies in the banking sector. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.37

Average Daily Volume

2,434

Number of Holdings *

16

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$109.16

Average Daily Volume

2,966

Number of Holdings *

94

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period GSIB CZA
30 Days 2.82% -0.61%
60 Days 8.39% 2.28%
90 Days 11.07% 7.36%
12 Months 27.50%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in GSIB Weight in CZA Overlap
STT A 4.08% 1.79% 1.79%
GSIB Overweight 15 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
WFC A 4.31%
MS A 4.29%
BK A 4.13%
GS A 3.99%
BAC A 3.74%
C A 3.73%
JPM A 3.72%
MUFG A 3.7%
MFG A 3.69%
BCS A 3.61%
SMFG A 3.59%
HSBC A 3.29%
SAN C 3.0%
TD D 2.89%
ING D 2.77%
GSIB Underweight 93 Positions Relative to CZA
Symbol Grade Weight
VMC B -2.47%
WAB B -2.19%
AVB B -2.11%
WTW B -2.02%
ETR A -2.01%
BRO B -1.98%
XYL D -1.93%
PPG D -1.83%
KEYS C -1.81%
EQR C -1.8%
LYB F -1.74%
DOV B -1.74%
LDOS C -1.68%
FTV D -1.67%
VLTO D -1.63%
AEE A -1.51%
WRB A -1.49%
BAH D -1.48%
CINF A -1.47%
IFF F -1.47%
TDY B -1.45%
ES C -1.41%
LPLA A -1.39%
PKG B -1.36%
NTRS A -1.36%
J D -1.33%
CSL C -1.32%
ESS A -1.28%
CHKP D -1.26%
PFG A -1.26%
AER C -1.25%
JBHT C -1.22%
FOX A -1.18%
CRBG B -1.14%
TRMB B -1.12%
MAS D -1.12%
BAX F -1.12%
IEX B -1.1%
PNR A -1.08%
WLK F -1.07%
WMG B -1.06%
GGG A -0.94%
UDR C -0.93%
ACM B -0.93%
AMCR D -0.92%
WES C -0.87%
GLPI C -0.87%
PFGC B -0.84%
REG A -0.84%
CNA C -0.84%
NVT C -0.82%
CACI C -0.8%
LOGI F -0.8%
WPC D -0.78%
ITT A -0.77%
RRX B -0.76%
ATR B -0.73%
EMN C -0.72%
CHDN C -0.7%
BWXT A -0.69%
AIZ A -0.68%
WWD B -0.67%
AOS F -0.66%
SEIC A -0.65%
ALSN A -0.64%
EHC B -0.63%
CR B -0.62%
INGR B -0.62%
TFX F -0.58%
KNTK A -0.56%
CHE D -0.52%
IVZ B -0.51%
ESAB B -0.5%
VOYA A -0.49%
BLCO B -0.47%
FLS A -0.46%
OSK B -0.46%
BPOP D -0.44%
MDU D -0.43%
AWI B -0.43%
ESI B -0.43%
COLD F -0.4%
SIGI B -0.38%
IDA A -0.38%
FNB A -0.38%
SLGN A -0.37%
ESNT D -0.37%
SNDR B -0.35%
RRR F -0.35%
CWEN C -0.34%
ACT D -0.33%
ST F -0.32%
FLO D -0.29%
Compare ETFs