GRPM vs. NBSM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Invesco S&P MidCap 400? GARP ETF (GRPM) to Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM)

GRPM

Invesco S&P MidCap 400? GARP ETF

GRPM Description

The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to track the performance of the top 60 growth stocks in the S&P MidCap 400® Index with relatively high quality and value composite scores, which are computed pursuant to the index methodology.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$122.23

Average Daily Volume

31,410

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

NBSM

Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF

NBSM Description

NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.37

Average Daily Volume

11,663

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	GRPM	NBSM
30 Days	5.48%	4.00%
60 Days	4.71%	4.33%
90 Days	3.48%	4.56%
12 Months	35.73%

8 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in GRPM	Weight in NBSM	Overlap
CNX	A	2.19%	2.68%	2.19%
CVLT	B	1.76%	0.51%	0.51%
EXP	B	1.45%	3.88%	1.45%
LECO	C	1.33%	1.99%	1.33%
LSCC	D	1.26%	1.77%	1.26%
MANH	D	1.36%	1.16%	1.16%
SSD	F	1.37%	1.37%	1.37%
TXRH	B	2.33%	1.94%	1.94%

GRPM Overweight 52 Positions Relative to NBSM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LNTH	D	2.88%
ROIV	C	2.85%
AAON	B	2.83%
HWC	B	2.63%
KNSL	B	2.43%
BYD	B	2.41%
AIT	B	2.31%
MTDR	B	2.23%
AN	C	2.14%
MUSA	B	2.14%
LAD	A	2.02%
EME	A	1.93%
CHRD	D	1.9%
AVT	C	1.86%
TEX	F	1.86%
FIX	A	1.84%
RMBS	B	1.83%
OZK	B	1.82%
EWBC	A	1.81%
HOG	D	1.75%
CIVI	D	1.73%
TOL	B	1.7%
RS	B	1.67%
RNR	C	1.63%
OC	A	1.6%
DINO	D	1.6%
IBOC	B	1.56%
DAR	C	1.54%
VAL	F	1.53%
CMC	B	1.45%
CROX	D	1.44%
MEDP	D	1.42%
VC	F	1.41%
KBH	D	1.38%
TMHC	C	1.38%
CELH	F	1.33%
PAG	B	1.33%
LOPE	C	1.32%
CBT	D	1.32%
PBF	D	1.32%
NFG	A	1.31%
SAIA	B	1.31%
OVV	B	1.3%
BLD	D	1.29%
AMG	B	1.28%
QLYS	B	1.14%
PII	F	1.08%
MUR	D	1.06%
AGCO	D	1.03%
RRC	B	1.0%
PVH	C	0.98%
ARW	D	0.95%

GRPM Underweight 38 Positions Relative to NBSM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FICO	B	-4.27%
KEX	B	-3.67%
WSO	A	-3.19%
ITT	A	-3.11%
VMI	B	-3.11%
RYAN	A	-3.08%
ATR	B	-2.93%
RBC	A	-2.92%
HAE	C	-2.9%
TYL	B	-2.72%
TTEK	F	-2.46%
CHE	D	-2.41%
RLI	A	-2.33%
CBU	B	-2.21%
MKSI	C	-2.17%
TTC	C	-2.12%
CR	A	-2.09%
GGG	B	-2.04%
LFUS	D	-1.99%
ENTG	D	-1.88%
CFR	B	-1.86%
TECH	F	-1.81%
NXST	C	-1.77%
POWI	F	-1.59%
TDW	F	-1.59%
PB	B	-1.59%
TSCO	D	-1.59%
BSY	F	-1.54%
SPSC	D	-1.51%
CHD	A	-1.51%
LNT	A	-1.49%
ROL	B	-1.46%
ICLR	D	-1.21%
IBP	D	-1.15%
BFAM	D	-1.14%
FND	D	-1.09%
AWI	A	-1.04%
CNM	D	-0.99%