GMF vs. NUEM ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) to NuShares ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF (NUEM)

GMF

SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF

GMF Description

The investment seeks investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index. The fund employs a sampling strategy in seeking to track the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It generally invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities comprising the index or in ADRs or GDRs based on securities comprising the index. The index is a market capitalization weighted index designed to define and measure the investable universe of publicly traded companies domiciled in emerging Asian Pacific markets. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$114.09

Average Daily Volume

17,327

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

NUEM

NuShares ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF

NUEM Description

The investment seeks to track the investment results, before fees and expenses, of the TIAA ESG Emerging Markets Equity Index (the "index"). In seeking to track the investment results of the index, the advisor attempts to replicate the index by investing all, or substantially all, of its assets in the securities represented in the index in approximately the same proportions as the index. The index identifies equity securities from the MSCI Emerging Markets Index that satisfy certain ESG criteria, based on ESG performance data collected by MSCI ESG Research, Inc.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.73

Average Daily Volume

21,819

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	GMF	NUEM
30 Days	-1.20%	-1.52%
60 Days	1.25%	1.32%
90 Days	-0.13%	0.94%
12 Months	16.76%	9.36%

10 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in GMF	Weight in NUEM	Overlap
ATHM	C	0.03%	0.24%	0.03%
BEKE	F	0.11%	0.05%	0.05%
BGNE	C	0.18%	0.18%	0.18%
BZ	F	0.04%	0.43%	0.04%
CHT	A	0.21%	0.02%	0.02%
HDB	C	1.61%	2.01%	1.61%
LI	D	0.16%	0.17%	0.16%
TME	F	0.03%	0.54%	0.03%
UMC	C	0.41%	1.5%	0.41%
VIPS	F	0.08%	0.32%	0.08%

GMF Overweight 48 Positions Relative to NUEM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TSM	D	8.58%
BABA	C	2.26%
IBN	A	1.26%
INFY	C	1.2%
PDD	F	0.92%
BIDU	F	0.36%
TCOM	C	0.35%
WIT	C	0.32%
MMYT	B	0.25%
YUMC	D	0.24%
ZTO	C	0.18%
NIO	D	0.11%
LEGN	F	0.07%
XPEV	D	0.07%
BILI	D	0.06%
TAL	F	0.06%
YMM	D	0.05%
SIMO	F	0.04%
YY	C	0.03%
MOMO	D	0.02%
GDS	C	0.02%
RLX	F	0.02%
MNSO	F	0.02%
QFIN	B	0.02%
HIMX	F	0.02%
BTBT	F	0.01%
VNET	C	0.01%
DAO	F	0.01%
WB	F	0.01%
JKS	D	0.01%
IQ	F	0.01%
TIGR	F	0.01%
SOHU	D	0.01%
DQ	D	0.01%
DADA	F	0.0%
IMAB	F	0.0%
API	F	0.0%
NIU	F	0.0%
CAN	D	0.0%
YI	F	0.0%
FANH	F	0.0%
LX	D	0.0%
TUYA	F	0.0%
IBN	A	0.0%
HUYA	D	0.0%
NOAH	D	0.0%
QD	D	0.0%
GOTU	F	0.0%

GMF Underweight 7 Positions Relative to NUEM

Symbol	Grade	Weight
KB	D	-1.12%
GGB	C	-0.61%
SHG	C	-0.43%
LPL	F	-0.32%
SKM	A	-0.3%
BAP	A	-0.25%
ERJ	C	-0.13%