GK vs. LCLG ETF Comparison

Comparison of AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) to Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG)
GK

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF

GK Description

GK seeks to provide a broad thematic exposure by actively investing in a growth-focused portfolio of US companies across a variety of long-term macro trends. It uses a multi-thematic approach to concentrate on disruptive investment themes while ensuring diversification across holdings. In selecting stocks, the fund adviser uses a three-part system which involves fundamental, technical, and qualitative analysis on firms that could benefit from long-term changes in the market. The funds investments may be of any market capitalization and may focus on innovative companies related to renewable energy and sustainable transportation, technology frontiers, video gaming and Esports, cannabis, online gambling, top consumer brands, pet and animal wellness, real estate disruption, healthcare and biotechnology, and the media industry. The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$22.35

Average Daily Volume

3,086

Number of Holdings *

30

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
LCLG

Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF

LCLG Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests primarily in securities of companies that use innovative technologies or ideas to gain advantage over competitors. The Advisor expects to invest principally in large capitalization equity securities that are traded on U.S. securities exchanges. The fund may invest up to 20% of its total assets in securities of foreign issuers, including issuers in emerging markets.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.90

Average Daily Volume

575

Number of Holdings *

57

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period GK LCLG
30 Days 2.12% 7.03%
60 Days 5.20% 9.73%
90 Days 5.09% 10.64%
12 Months 29.73% 40.52%
7 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in GK Weight in LCLG Overlap
AAPL C 6.39% 4.63% 4.63%
AMZN C 4.09% 4.3% 4.09%
AVGO D 3.52% 3.99% 3.52%
GOOG C 4.25% 1.8% 1.8%
HD B 2.7% 0.93% 0.93%
LPLA A 1.61% 0.87% 0.87%
NFLX A 6.55% 5.14% 5.14%
GK Overweight 23 Positions Relative to LCLG
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA B 8.86%
MSFT D 7.4%
TT A 5.6%
LEN D 5.05%
BX A 5.01%
DIS B 4.88%
NVO F 4.35%
IBIT A 3.94%
MGM D 3.75%
ORCL A 3.46%
DELL B 2.15%
SYK B 1.81%
WMT A 1.8%
UBER F 1.63%
ASML F 1.47%
ONON A 1.38%
GD D 1.38%
AMD F 1.38%
VICI C 1.07%
LLY F 1.0%
FLUT A 0.91%
TSLA B 0.53%
REGN F 0.42%
GK Underweight 50 Positions Relative to LCLG
Symbol Grade Weight
APP B -5.16%
MA B -4.62%
APH A -4.28%
META D -3.86%
KLAC F -3.65%
DKS D -3.01%
CTAS B -2.83%
URI C -2.58%
GOOGL C -2.56%
FAST B -2.32%
ODFL C -2.16%
DECK A -1.86%
TTD B -1.78%
COIN C -1.78%
LAD A -1.76%
BURL B -1.75%
ANET C -1.69%
WSM C -1.65%
CPRT B -1.62%
SHW B -1.58%
MTD F -1.58%
TXRH B -1.54%
LECO C -1.46%
EA A -1.32%
WAT C -1.29%
SBUX A -1.28%
ZBRA B -1.2%
ADBE C -1.1%
ACN B -1.07%
MAR A -0.98%
NDSN B -0.96%
GPK C -0.9%
MNST C -0.87%
PAYC B -0.84%
A D -0.82%
HUBB B -0.8%
IQV F -0.69%
LOGI D -0.68%
LULU C -0.66%
ZTS D -0.59%
TRMB B -0.58%
ELF C -0.56%
ETN A -0.53%
POOL C -0.45%
CRL D -0.41%
NSP F -0.4%
LW C -0.38%
RH C -0.36%
OMF A -0.35%
IPGP D -0.25%
Compare ETFs