GDMA vs. CANQ ETF Comparison
Comparison of Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) to Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF (CANQ)
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
GDMA Description
The investment seeks total return. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing (i) approximately 80% of its total assets with exposure to a variety of asset classes, geographies, and market capitalizations generally based on a long-term view of macroeconomic factors and (ii) approximately 20% of its total assets to add or reduce exposure to one or more asset classes generally based on a short-term view of the market. It may invest in futures contracts to gain long or short exposure to one or more asset classes.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.95
Average Daily Volume
5,002
13
CANQ
Calamos Alternative Nasdaq & Bond ETF
CANQ Description
The fund pursues its objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80%, but up to 100%, of its net assets (plus borrowings for investment purposes, if any) in a portfolio of equity instruments (including options and equity ETFs) and fixed income instruments (including bonds and fixed income ETFs) intended to deliver convertible security-like exposure to companies in the Nasdaq-100 Index. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.41
Average Daily Volume
539
5
Performance
| Period | GDMA | CANQ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 1.36% | 1.82% |
| 60 Days | 1.67% | 2.88% |
| 90 Days | 2.62% | 3.36% |
| 12 Months | 12.45% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in GDMA | Weight in CANQ | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAAA | A | 8.18% | 6.38% | 6.38% |
GDMA: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
CANQ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
