GCAD vs. NBSM ETF Comparison
Comparison of Gabelli Equity Income ETF (GCAD) to Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM)
GCAD
Gabelli Equity Income ETF
GCAD Description
The fund will seek to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in securities in income producing equity securities including securities in the aerospace and defense sectors. Aerospace companies include manufacturers, assemblers and distributors of aircraft and aircraft parts. Defense companies include producers of components and equipment for the defense industry, such as military aircraft, radar equipment and weapons.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$33.26
Average Daily Volume
677
31
NBSM
Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF
NBSM Description
NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.95
Average Daily Volume
10,788
44
Performance
Period | GCAD | NBSM |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -2.84% | -1.94% |
60 Days | -2.80% | -0.96% |
90 Days | 3.12% | 2.29% |
12 Months | 30.96% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in GCAD | Weight in NBSM | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR | B | 3.68% | 1.99% | 1.99% |
GCAD Overweight 30 Positions Relative to NBSM
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
BA | F | 8.08% | |
SPR | C | 6.93% | |
HXL | F | 6.04% | |
MOG.A | C | 5.73% | |
DCO | D | 5.35% | |
HON | B | 4.74% | |
LMT | D | 4.32% | |
CW | B | 3.96% | |
WWD | D | 3.94% | |
RTX | C | 3.72% | |
HEI | D | 3.72% | |
HWM | B | 3.42% | |
TXT | F | 3.38% | |
LHX | A | 3.24% | |
NOC | D | 3.23% | |
MRCY | D | 3.0% | |
GE | D | 2.94% | |
LDOS | A | 2.92% | |
AIN | F | 2.5% | |
B | A | 2.3% | |
TGI | C | 2.08% | |
GD | C | 1.88% | |
CDRE | D | 1.57% | |
RDW | B | 1.39% | |
KTOS | C | 1.04% | |
PKE | C | 0.96% | |
AIR | F | 0.86% | |
ATRO | F | 0.82% | |
LLAP | F | 0.26% | |
MYNA | C | 0.18% |
GCAD Underweight 43 Positions Relative to NBSM
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
FICO | B | -3.85% | |
EXP | B | -3.8% | |
KEX | D | -3.4% | |
TTEK | B | -3.08% | |
ITT | C | -3.02% | |
WSO | D | -3.01% | |
VMI | A | -3.0% | |
RYAN | C | -3.0% | |
ATR | A | -2.97% | |
TYL | A | -2.82% | |
RBC | D | -2.74% | |
CNX | B | -2.49% | |
CHE | F | -2.43% | |
HAE | F | -2.39% | |
TTC | F | -2.19% | |
RLI | B | -2.18% | |
CBU | A | -2.07% | |
LFUS | D | -2.05% | |
ENTG | D | -2.04% | |
MKSI | F | -2.0% | |
NXST | A | -1.97% | |
TXRH | A | -1.96% | |
GGG | D | -1.96% | |
LECO | B | -1.94% | |
TECH | B | -1.93% | |
TDW | F | -1.88% | |
LSCC | C | -1.86% | |
CFR | B | -1.78% | |
POWI | C | -1.62% | |
BSY | F | -1.62% | |
TSCO | D | -1.6% | |
BFAM | C | -1.5% | |
PB | B | -1.49% | |
CHD | B | -1.47% | |
SPSC | F | -1.46% | |
ROL | D | -1.44% | |
SSD | F | -1.42% | |
ICLR | F | -1.41% | |
IBP | F | -1.26% | |
MANH | D | -1.15% | |
FND | D | -1.15% | |
CNM | D | -1.1% | |
LNT | C | -1.0% |
GCAD: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
NBSM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords