FSST vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF (FSST) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
FSST

Fidelity Sustainability U.S. Equity ETF

FSST Description

FSST mainly invests in US companies that the fund adviser believes to have proven or improving sustainability practices. Evaluation of the companies impact characteristics may involve corporate engagement and its alignment with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals using qualitative analysis as well as proprietary or third-party data. Their approach to sustainable investing not only considers ESG factors but fundamental ones as well, including financial conditions, industry positions, as well as market and economic conditions. Unlike other ETFs that disclose holdings on a daily basis, FSST publishes its full portfolio holdings monthly with a 30-day lag. A Tracking Basket Structure is in place which acts as a proxy portfolio and may include holdings from recent disclosures, other liquid ETFs as well as cash and cash equivalents in order to track the funds daily performance and facilitate arbitrage opportunities.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.88

Average Daily Volume

2,709

Number of Holdings *

66

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$22.93

Average Daily Volume

47,799

Number of Holdings *

54

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FSST PGJ
30 Days 2.00% -6.73%
60 Days 4.84% -11.39%
90 Days 4.34% -3.46%
12 Months 25.36% -6.73%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FSST Weight in PGJ Overlap
FSST Overweight 66 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
MSFT A 7.68%
NVDA B 6.05%
GOOGL A 4.4%
AMZN A 4.15%
AAPL A 3.06%
MRK C 3.01%
PG C 2.94%
CI D 2.71%
TRV D 2.65%
DIS D 2.39%
MCO A 2.13%
MA C 2.06%
AXP C 2.06%
LIN C 2.04%
KBR D 1.84%
ACN D 1.84%
ON C 1.79%
LOW D 1.75%
CRM C 1.71%
BKR C 1.66%
ICLR B 1.63%
BLK B 1.58%
AYI D 1.44%
AVY D 1.36%
DHR D 1.35%
NEE D 1.3%
PLD C 1.29%
INTU A 1.29%
VLTO D 1.16%
GILD C 1.15%
CNC D 1.14%
HLT B 1.11%
JCI D 1.09%
UPS D 1.02%
CMCSA F 0.98%
CCK F 0.95%
IR C 0.92%
TMHC D 0.91%
DE F 0.9%
TSLA B 0.89%
LNG B 0.88%
SFM B 0.86%
RRX F 0.85%
ACI F 0.83%
SBUX F 0.82%
C B 0.8%
NFLX A 0.79%
MAN D 0.74%
ZTS C 0.72%
TGNA D 0.72%
BAC B 0.63%
AMD B 0.61%
NTRS C 0.58%
TKR D 0.56%
NXPI B 0.54%
FSLR C 0.54%
APTV F 0.54%
VOYA D 0.53%
EL F 0.53%
GNRC C 0.53%
CWEN D 0.5%
DFS B 0.49%
NOMD D 0.39%
MRNA D 0.34%
GM B 0.25%
CVS D 0.18%
FSST Underweight 54 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
BABA D -8.2%
TCOM C -8.19%
JD D -6.95%
BIDU F -6.91%
YUMC F -6.6%
NTES D -4.58%
TME B -4.39%
BEKE C -3.96%
ZTO F -3.87%
NIO F -3.84%
BZ D -3.61%
VIPS F -3.41%
YMM D -3.22%
HTHT F -3.15%
TAL D -2.69%
LI F -2.59%
QFIN D -1.77%
IQ D -1.24%
XPEV F -1.2%
BILI C -1.15%
ATHM D -1.13%
HOLI B -0.94%
RLX F -0.79%
ATAT B -0.75%
MNSO F -0.74%
DQ F -0.71%
MOMO B -0.65%
CSIQ F -0.63%
GDS B -0.63%
FINV C -0.57%
JKS D -0.57%
ZLAB F -0.54%
GOTU D -0.53%
WB D -0.48%
TIGR B -0.37%
EH D -0.36%
SOHU A -0.3%
HUYA C -0.27%
QD F -0.23%
VNET C -0.2%
RERE C -0.19%
DOYU B -0.19%
DDL C -0.18%
NOAH D -0.17%
LX F -0.14%
TUYA F -0.13%
KC F -0.12%
API D -0.11%
WDH D -0.1%
DADA F -0.1%
DAO C -0.09%
BZUN D -0.07%
NIU F -0.06%
IMAB F -0.06%
Compare ETFs