FOVL vs. CZA ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares Focused Value Factor ETF (FOVL) to Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF (CZA)

FOVL

iShares Focused Value Factor ETF

FOVL Description

The investment seeks to track the to track the investment results of the Focused Value Select Index, which is an objective, rules-based, equal-weighted equity index provided by FTSE Russell. The underlying index measures the performance of large- and mid-capitalization U.S. companies with prominent value factor characteristics, as determined by Russell. The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its assets in the component securities of the underlying index and may invest up to 10% of its assets in certain futures, options and swap contracts, cash and cash equivalents. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$72.41

Average Daily Volume

2,265

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

CZA

Guggenheim Mid-Cap Core ETF

CZA Description

The investment seeks investment results that correspond generally to the performance, before the fund's fees and expenses, of an index called the Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index. The fund will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the index and depositary receipts representing securities that comprise the index. It generally invests in all of the securities comprising the index in proportion to their weightings in the index. The index is comprised of 100 securities selected, based on investment and other criteria, from a universe of mid-capitalization securities including MLPs, ADRs and BDCs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$109.94

Average Daily Volume

2,883

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	FOVL	CZA
30 Days	3.40%	0.43%
60 Days	10.89%	4.60%
90 Days	14.47%	8.07%
12 Months	42.75%	28.25%

7 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in FOVL	Weight in CZA	Overlap
CNA	C	2.34%	0.84%	0.84%
CWEN	D	2.08%	0.34%	0.34%
ETR	B	2.69%	2.01%	2.01%
FNB	B	2.81%	0.38%	0.38%
NTRS	A	2.81%	1.36%	1.36%
PFG	C	2.4%	1.26%	1.26%
VOYA	B	2.49%	0.49%	0.49%

FOVL Overweight 33 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FHN	A	3.03%
DFS	B	3.0%
MTB	A	2.84%
FHB	B	2.82%
CMA	A	2.77%
JHG	A	2.77%
BAC	A	2.74%
ALK	A	2.7%
PNC	B	2.7%
RF	A	2.66%
WTM	A	2.65%
OZK	B	2.65%
USB	B	2.63%
FITB	A	2.61%
HPE	B	2.52%
CMCSA	B	2.5%
OGE	B	2.5%
AXS	A	2.49%
PNW	A	2.43%
EVRG	A	2.43%
PRGO	C	2.38%
AVT	C	2.36%
MET	C	2.36%
D	D	2.34%
MTG	C	2.31%
RNR	D	2.29%
UGI	D	2.25%
RPRX	F	2.18%
BG	D	2.14%
VZ	D	2.13%
ADM	F	2.04%
CRI	D	1.91%
CNXC	F	1.88%

FOVL Underweight 87 Positions Relative to CZA

Symbol	Grade	Weight
VMC	B	-2.47%
WAB	B	-2.19%
AVB	B	-2.11%
WTW	A	-2.02%
BRO	B	-1.98%
XYL	F	-1.93%
PPG	F	-1.83%
KEYS	C	-1.81%
EQR	C	-1.8%
STT	B	-1.79%
LYB	F	-1.74%
DOV	A	-1.74%
LDOS	C	-1.68%
FTV	C	-1.67%
VLTO	D	-1.63%
AEE	B	-1.51%
WRB	B	-1.49%
BAH	C	-1.48%
CINF	A	-1.47%
IFF	F	-1.47%
TDY	B	-1.45%
ES	D	-1.41%
LPLA	A	-1.39%
PKG	B	-1.36%
J	D	-1.33%
CSL	B	-1.32%
ESS	C	-1.28%
CHKP	C	-1.26%
AER	B	-1.25%
JBHT	C	-1.22%
FOX	A	-1.18%
CRBG	C	-1.14%
TRMB	B	-1.12%
MAS	D	-1.12%
BAX	F	-1.12%
IEX	B	-1.1%
PNR	A	-1.08%
WLK	F	-1.07%
WMG	B	-1.06%
GGG	B	-0.94%
UDR	C	-0.93%
ACM	B	-0.93%
AMCR	D	-0.92%
WES	C	-0.87%
GLPI	D	-0.87%
PFGC	B	-0.84%
REG	A	-0.84%
NVT	C	-0.82%
CACI	C	-0.8%
LOGI	F	-0.8%
WPC	F	-0.78%
ITT	A	-0.77%
RRX	B	-0.76%
ATR	A	-0.73%
EMN	D	-0.72%
CHDN	B	-0.7%
BWXT	B	-0.69%
AIZ	A	-0.68%
WWD	B	-0.67%
AOS	F	-0.66%
SEIC	A	-0.65%
ALSN	B	-0.64%
EHC	B	-0.63%
CR	B	-0.62%
INGR	B	-0.62%
TFX	F	-0.58%
KNTK	B	-0.56%
CHE	D	-0.52%
IVZ	B	-0.51%
ESAB	B	-0.5%
BLCO	C	-0.47%
FLS	B	-0.46%
OSK	B	-0.46%
BPOP	C	-0.44%
MDU	D	-0.43%
AWI	B	-0.43%
ESI	B	-0.43%
COLD	F	-0.4%
SIGI	B	-0.38%
IDA	A	-0.38%
SLGN	B	-0.37%
ESNT	D	-0.37%
SNDR	B	-0.35%
RRR	F	-0.35%
ACT	C	-0.33%
ST	F	-0.32%
FLO	F	-0.29%