FLV vs. VIRS ETF Comparison

Comparison of American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) to Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF (VIRS)
FLV

American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF

FLV Description

The investment seeks long-term capital growth. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of large capitalization companies. The portfolio managers may sell stocks from the fund's portfolio if they believe a stock no longer meets their valuation criteria, a stock's risk parameters outweigh its return opportunity, more attractive alternatives are identified or specific events alter a stock's prospects.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$63.82

Average Daily Volume

5,967

Number of Holdings *

39

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
VIRS

Pacer BioThreat Strategy ETF

VIRS Description An exchange traded fund (ETF) that seeks to track the LifeSci BioThreat Strategy Index to invest in U.S. listed companies whose products or services help to protect against, endure or recover from biological threats to human health. The index aims to: Research of current and future pandemics. Combat agents of biological warfare. Detect the presence of biological threats. Secure national borders and ports and strengthen homeland security. Aid in stockpiling of products needed in times of natural disasters and disease outbreaks. Improve food and water safety and purity. Enable technology to benefit work and stay at home mandates.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.02

Average Daily Volume

107

Number of Holdings *

51

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FLV VIRS
30 Days 0.46% 1.01%
60 Days -1.87% 4.29%
90 Days 2.21% 6.84%
12 Months 7.01% 19.41%
3 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FLV Weight in VIRS Overlap
DGX B 2.62% 0.57% 0.57%
JNJ D 6.89% 4.92% 4.92%
KMB A 2.64% 1.74% 1.74%
FLV Overweight 36 Positions Relative to VIRS
Symbol Grade Weight
MDT D 5.45%
ZBH F 4.23%
DUK B 4.19%
ATO B 3.76%
XOM D 3.64%
UL A 3.54%
NSC D 3.45%
CL B 3.39%
UPS F 3.38%
TTE D 3.01%
RGA A 2.87%
JPM B 2.86%
TFC A 2.64%
HSIC D 2.5%
BRK.A C 2.28%
KVUE F 2.24%
BK A 2.17%
ALL D 2.17%
RTX D 2.14%
SON F 2.02%
FFIV C 1.97%
NVS B 1.97%
MDLZ F 1.93%
BDX F 1.92%
CAG F 1.79%
VZ B 1.78%
SCHW C 1.61%
BUD D 1.54%
TEL A 1.54%
ADI B 1.52%
PKG C 1.31%
BLK B 1.26%
CSCO D 1.25%
MMC A 1.25%
PSA B 1.11%
DIS F 1.04%
FLV Underweight 48 Positions Relative to VIRS
Symbol Grade Weight
AMZN C -5.29%
NFLX C -5.02%
WMT B -4.97%
ABT D -4.95%
MRK C -4.92%
DHR D -4.85%
HD C -4.83%
TMO D -4.73%
LOW C -4.65%
NVDA C -4.61%
SNY B -4.48%
REGN B -4.28%
GILD C -3.18%
GSK D -2.93%
CVS F -2.72%
ECL A -2.54%
MMM B -2.12%
PLTR B -2.08%
MRNA D -1.72%
A D -1.41%
HLN A -1.4%
KR C -1.34%
XYL D -1.23%
MTD D -1.12%
CHD D -0.95%
VLTO D -0.9%
BAH B -0.75%
BNTX F -0.71%
TDY D -0.68%
ZM F -0.67%
WAT D -0.63%
CLX D -0.63%
ILMN D -0.63%
HRL F -0.62%
AKAM D -0.51%
CPB B -0.5%
WBA F -0.39%
QGEN D -0.34%
SOLV F -0.33%
OGN C -0.2%
SRCL B -0.2%
NEOG C -0.13%
FTRE F -0.08%
ENR C -0.08%
TDOC F -0.07%
SCL C -0.07%
VIR F -0.05%
EBS B -0.01%
Compare ETFs