ESGX vs. XMHQ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF (ESGX) to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ)
ESGX

Tuttle Capital Shareholders First Index ETF

ESGX Description

ESGX invests in US-listed companies determined to have high shareholder value, unencumbered by ESG restrictions, such as political stances or conforming to a greater social goal of stakeholder capitalism. Using a proprietary methodology, the fund assigns stocks with shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The shareholder value creation score considers information on corporate donations, advocacy, activities, and policies gathered from different data sources. The financial metrics score separately calculates a securitys one-year and five-year price performance, closing price, cash, revenue, debt-to-equity ratio, average dividend yield, profit margin, and market capitalization. Companies are ranked according to the highest shareholder value creation and financial metric scores. The fund selects and weights 50 companies from the resulting sets of filtered companies. The index is rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.79

Average Daily Volume

101

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XMHQ

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF

XMHQ Description The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the S&P MidCap 400® Quality Index (the underlying index). The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. Strictly in accordance with its guidelines and mandated procedures, the index provider first calculates the quality score of each security in the S&P MidCap 400® Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$105.30

Average Daily Volume

310,804

Number of Holdings *

76

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period ESGX XMHQ
30 Days -0.71% 3.12%
60 Days 0.93% 3.51%
90 Days 3.55%
12 Months 28.09%
7 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in ESGX Weight in XMHQ Overlap
DCI B 2.04% 1.12% 1.12%
IBOC B 2.11% 0.49% 0.49%
KNSL B 1.67% 1.8% 1.67%
LNTH D 1.52% 0.94% 0.94%
MANH D 1.97% 4.08% 1.97%
RLI A 2.33% 1.1% 1.1%
SEIC B 2.33% 1.28% 1.28%
ESGX Overweight 42 Positions Relative to XMHQ
Symbol Grade Weight
GTLS A 2.58%
WST C 2.51%
TYL B 2.4%
VTRS A 2.37%
NWS A 2.33%
VNO C 2.3%
GEF A 2.27%
TPX B 2.26%
JBHT C 2.24%
EVRG A 2.21%
PNR A 2.19%
SLGN A 2.17%
VRSN C 2.16%
SYY D 2.14%
EHC B 2.1%
FFIV B 2.08%
KIM A 2.07%
SYNA C 2.06%
PNW A 2.06%
TDY B 2.05%
DXCM C 2.02%
ROL B 2.02%
RVTY F 1.95%
KEYS A 1.92%
FRT B 1.91%
LKQ F 1.88%
HST C 1.88%
MAA B 1.85%
STE D 1.82%
POOL C 1.82%
CNP A 1.81%
SWKS F 1.81%
O C 1.75%
GPC D 1.74%
POST C 1.73%
WEX D 1.7%
MCHP F 1.69%
EGP D 1.67%
BCO F 1.54%
HII F 1.45%
QRVO F 1.19%
ENPH F 1.09%
ESGX Underweight 69 Positions Relative to XMHQ
Symbol Grade Weight
CSL C -3.86%
EME A -3.81%
WSM C -3.43%
FIX A -2.48%
THC D -2.39%
RS B -2.38%
RNR C -2.28%
OC A -2.16%
LECO C -2.08%
GGG B -2.05%
TOL B -2.03%
PSTG D -1.86%
CW C -1.83%
DT D -1.66%
MEDP D -1.62%
BLD D -1.59%
DKS D -1.57%
EXP B -1.45%
CR A -1.44%
MUSA B -1.43%
AYI B -1.43%
AIT B -1.4%
CVLT B -1.38%
PRI B -1.35%
WMS F -1.34%
INGR C -1.32%
AFG A -1.3%
RGLD C -1.3%
CHE D -1.3%
TREX C -1.3%
PCTY C -1.22%
UFPI C -1.21%
CNM D -1.2%
CELH F -1.13%
LSTR D -1.13%
LSCC D -1.09%
SAIC F -1.03%
CROX D -1.02%
SSD F -1.01%
WFRD D -0.96%
QLYS B -0.94%
G B -0.94%
ELF C -0.93%
VNT C -0.91%
COKE C -0.9%
ROIV C -0.9%
CHX C -0.88%
DINO D -0.87%
KBH D -0.85%
MSA F -0.84%
CBT D -0.82%
MTG C -0.81%
VVV D -0.8%
ESNT F -0.74%
EXPO D -0.74%
CRUS D -0.66%
MSM C -0.66%
LOPE C -0.64%
NEU D -0.6%
LANC C -0.52%
FHI B -0.51%
ENS F -0.49%
TEX F -0.48%
SAM C -0.48%
YETI D -0.48%
NSP F -0.47%
VC F -0.39%
CXT C -0.35%
CRI F -0.32%
Compare ETFs